Food- and drug-reinforced responding: Effects of DITA and d -amphetamine
dc.contributor.author | Woods, James H. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Downs, David A. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T17:43:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T17:43:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1975-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Downs, David A.; Woods, James H.; (1975). "Food- and drug-reinforced responding: Effects of DITA and d -amphetamine." Psychopharmacologia 43(1): 13-17. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46391> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-2072 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0033-3158 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46391 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1161990&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Intravenous pretreatment with DITA (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) decreased the rate of food-reinforced lever pressing in rhesus monkeys. Response rate decreases were dose-dependent but showed the development of tolerance. Self-administration of DITA was initiated and maintained in each of three monkeys when 30 lever presses were required to produce each injection. Maximal response rate during periods of drug availability was maintained by 0.03 mg/kg/injection while higher and lower doses (0.01 and 0.10 mg/kg/injection) maintained lower response rates. Response rate in periods of food availability immediately preceding drug periods was relatively constant across sessions; response rate in periods of food availability immediately following drug periods, however, decreased with increasing amounts of drug self-administered. Replication of initial self-administration doses produced results comparable to original determinations in contrast to the tolerance observed with DITA effects upon food-reinforced responding. DITA was about 3 times less potent than d -amphetamine in maintaining response rates in drug periods and in decreasing the rate of subsequent food-reinforced responding. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 556702 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Lever-Press | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Food Reinforcement | en_US |
dc.subject.other | D -Amphetamine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Pharmacology/Toxicology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Drug Self-Administration | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Fixed-Ratio | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Rhesus Monkeys | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Biomedicine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | DITA | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.title | Food- and drug-reinforced responding: Effects of DITA and d -amphetamine | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Neurosciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Chemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Biological Chemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Departments of Pharmacology and Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Departments of Pharmacology and Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 1161990 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46391/1/213_2004_Article_BF00437608.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00437608 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Psychopharmacologia | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.