Show simple item record

Behavior maintained by intravenous injection of codeine, cocaine, and etorphine in the rhesus macaque and the pigtail macaque

dc.contributor.authorYoung, Alice M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoods, James H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T17:45:19Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T17:45:19Z
dc.date.issued1980-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationYoung, Alice M.; Woods, James H.; (1980). "Behavior maintained by intravenous injection of codeine, cocaine, and etorphine in the rhesus macaque and the pigtail macaque." Psychopharmacology 70(3): 263-271. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46415>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-3158en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-2072en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46415
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=6777798&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractLever-pressing behavior of two species of macaque, the rhesus macaque ( M. mulatta ) and the pigtail macaque ( M. nemestrina ) was maintained by intravenous injection of codeine, etorphine, or cocaine. Monkeys responded under a fixed-ratio 30 timeout 600 s schedule of drug injection during two daily experimental sessions. Drug-maintained behavior was studied under two access conditions. Under the first condition, selected doses of codeine or cocaine were available for ten consecutive sessions. Under the second condition, responding was maintained by 0.32 mg/kg codeine or 0.32 mg/kg cocaine, and saline and selected doses of codeine, etorphine, and cocaine were substituted during single experimental sessions. Performance varied with drug and injection dose, access condition, and macaque species. For all three drugs, response rate increased and then decreased as injection dose increased. Maximal rates were maintained by 0.10–0.32 mg/kg codeine, 0.0003–0.001 mg/kg etorphine, and 0.10–0.32 mg/kg cocaine. A cocaine dose of 0.32 mg/kg maintained higher rates than any dose of codeine or etorphine, and maintained higher rates when available during consecutive sessions than when substituted for codeine for a single session. Codeine maintained similar rates under all access conditions. The pigtail macaques had short catheter lives, did not readily acquire codeine-maintained responding, and displayed lower rates of drug-maintained lever pressing than the rhesus macaques.en_US
dc.format.extent1009872 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherRhesus Macaquesen_US
dc.subject.otherFixed-ratio Scheduleen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.otherDrug Self-administrationen_US
dc.subject.otherPharmacology/Toxicologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCodeineen_US
dc.subject.otherCocaineen_US
dc.subject.otherEtorphineen_US
dc.subject.otherPigtail Macaquesen_US
dc.titleBehavior maintained by intravenous injection of codeine, cocaine, and etorphine in the rhesus macaque and the pigtail macaqueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid6777798en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46415/1/213_2004_Article_BF00427883.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00427883en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsychopharmacologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.