Show simple item record

Dynamic posture analysis of Spacelab-1 crew members

dc.contributor.authorWerness, Susan A. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReschke, M. F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, D. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHomick, J. E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T17:55:33Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T17:55:33Z
dc.date.issued1986-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, D. J.; Reschke, M. F.; Homick, J. E.; Werness, S. A. S.; (1986). "Dynamic posture analysis of Spacelab-1 crew members." Experimental Brain Research 64(2): 380-391. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46556>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1106en_US
dc.identifier.issn0014-4819en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46556
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=3803478&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractDynamic posture testing was conducted on the science crew of the Spacelab-1 mission on a single axis linear motion platform. Tests took place in pre- and post-flight sessions lasting approximately 20 min each. The pre-flight tests were widely spaced over the several months prior to the mission while the post-flight tests were conducted over the first, second, fourth, and sixth days after landing. Two of the crew members were also tested on the day of landing. Consistent with previous postural testing conducted on flight crews, these crew members were able to complete simple postural tasks to an acceptable level even in the first few hours after landing. Our tests were designed to induce dynamic postural responses using a variety of stimuli and from these responses, evaluate subtle changes in the postural control system which had occurred over the duration of the flight. Periodic sampling post-flight allowed us to observe the time course of readaptation to terrestrial life. Our observations of hip and shoulder position, when subjected to careful analysis, indicated modification of the postural response from pre- to post-flight and that demonstrable adjustments in the dynamic control of their postural systems were taking place in the first few days after flight. For transient stimuli where the platform on which they were asked to stand quickly moved a few centimeters fore or aft then stopped, ballistic or open loop ‘programs’ would closely characterize the response. During these responses the desired target position was not always achieved and of equal importance not always properly corrected some 15 seconds after the platform ceased to move. The persistent observation was that the subjects had a much stronger dependence on visual stabilization post-flight than pre-flight. This was best illustrated by a slow or only partial recovery to an upward posture after a transient base-of-support movement with eyes open. Postural responses to persistent wideband pseudorandom base-of-support translation stimuli were modeled as time invarient linear systems arrived at by Kaiman adaptive filter techniques. Derived model parame ters such as damping factor and fundamental frequency of the closed loop system showed significant modification between pre- and post-flight. This phenomenon is best characterized by movement of the poles toward increasing stability. While pre-flight data tended to show shoulders and hips moving in phase with each other, post-flight data showed a more disjoint behavior. One can speculate that this change illustrates a shattered postural organization or an acquired strategy not designed to stabilize terrestrial posture but as a carry over from optimum inflight postural control. Given our observations one can never be certain if these changes represent modifications in the physiology of posture of purposeful changes in strategy. As in other examples of motion behavior, the time domain analysis as represented by the step changes in position is not always reconcilable with the system modeling of pseudorandum responses and subsequent frequency domain analysis as represented by the pseudorandom noise stimuli. We present the observed data with arguments and some contradictions as to the nature of the adaptive changes which occur in the postural control system.en_US
dc.format.extent845703 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherAdaptationen_US
dc.subject.otherNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherNeurologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPostureen_US
dc.subject.otherSpace Flighten_US
dc.titleDynamic posture analysis of Spacelab-1 crew membersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Kresge Hearing Research Institute, The University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEnvironmental Research Institute of Michigan, 48105, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSpace Biomedical Research Institute, NASA-Johnson Space Center, 77058, Houston, TX, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSpace Biomedical Research Institute, NASA-Johnson Space Center, 77058, Houston, TX, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid3803478en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46556/1/221_2004_Article_BF00237754.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00237754en_US
dc.identifier.sourceExperimental Brain Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.