Show simple item record

Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movement

dc.contributor.authorJaeger, Dieteren_US
dc.contributor.authorGilman, Siden_US
dc.contributor.authorAldridge, J. Wayneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T17:56:17Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T17:56:17Z
dc.date.issued1993-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationJaeger, Dieter; Gilman, Sid; Aldridge, J. Wayne; (1993). "Primate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movement." Experimental Brain Research 95(1): 51-64. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46566>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1106en_US
dc.identifier.issn0014-4819en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46566
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8405253&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractSingle cell activity was recorded from the primate putamen, caudate nucleus, and globus pallidus during a precued reaching movement task. Two monkeys were trained to touch one of several target knobs mounted in front of them after an LED was lighted on the correct target. A precue was presented prior to this target “go cue” by a randomly varied delay interval, giving the animals partial or complete advance information about the target for the movement task. The purpose of this design was to examine neuronal activity in the major structures of the basal ganglia during the preparation phase of limb movements when varying amounts of advance information were provided to the animals. The reaction times were shortest with complete precues, intermediate with partial precues, and longest with precues containing no information, demonstrating that the animals used precue information to prepare partly or completely for the reaching movement before the target go cue was given. Changes in activity were seen in the basal ganglia during the preparatory period in 30% of neurons in putamen, 31% in caudate nucleus, and 27% in globus pallidus. Preparatory changes were stronger and more closely linked to the time of movement initiation in putamen than in caudate nucleus. Although the amount of information contained in the precues had no significant effect on preparatory activity preceding the target go cue, a directional selectivity during this period was observed for a subset of neurons with preparatory changes (15% in putamen, 11% in caudate nucleus, 14% in globus pallidus) when the precue contained information about the upcoming direction of movement. A smaller subset of neurons showed selectivity for the preparation of movement amplitude. A larger number of preparatory changes showed selectivity for the direction or amplitude of movement following the target go cue than in the delay period before the cue. The intensity of preparatory changes in activity in many cases depended on the length of the delay interval preceding the target go cue. Even following the target go cue, the intensity of the preparatory changes in activity continued to be significantly influenced by the length of the preceding delay interval for 11% of changes in putamen, 8% in caudate nucleus, and 18% in globus pallidus. This finding suggests that preparatory activity in the basal ganglia takes part in a process termed motor readiness. Behaviorally, this process was seen as a shortening of reaction time regardless of precue information for trials in which the delay interval was long and the animals showed an increased readiness to move. Preparatory activity in putamen following the target go cue was most intense in trials with a short delay interval, in which motor readiness had not achieved its maximum level prior to the go cue. The results of this study indicate that the basal ganglia are involved in multiple aspects of preparatory processing for limb movement. Preparatory processing is therefore unlikely to be divided anatomically along the functional lines examined in this study. In the basal ganglia, preparatory processing reflects both preparation for target selection and control of timing the onset of movement (motor readiness). These characteristics can be integrated in a functional scheme in which the basal ganglia are predominantly responsible for the automated execution of well-trained behavior.en_US
dc.format.extent1552807 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherMonkeyen_US
dc.subject.otherBasal Gangliaen_US
dc.subject.otherPrecueen_US
dc.subject.otherNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherNeurologyen_US
dc.subject.otherMotor Controlen_US
dc.subject.otherSingle Uniten_US
dc.titlePrimate basal ganglia activity in a precued reaching task: preparation for movementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Lab. Bldg., University of Michigan, 1103 E, 48104, Huron, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Lab. Bldg., University of Michigan, 1103 E, 48104, Huron, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Lab. Bldg., University of Michigan, 1103 E, 48104, Huron, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid8405253en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46566/1/221_2004_Article_BF00229653.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00229653en_US
dc.identifier.sourceExperimental Brain Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.