Show simple item record

Stage-I osteochondritis dissecans versus normal variants of ossification in the knee in children

dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Ramiro J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGebarski, Kathleen Stiennonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:07:18Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:07:18Z
dc.date.issued2005-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationGebarski, Kathleen; Hernandez, Ramiro J.; (2005). "Stage-I osteochondritis dissecans versus normal variants of ossification in the knee in children." Pediatric Radiology 35(9): 880-886. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46719>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-0449en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46719
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15940391&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) has a better prognosis than the adult type. Objective : We postulated that the excellent prognosis of juvenile OCD could be explained, at least in part, by the erroneous diagnosis of some developmental variants of ossification as stage-I OCD. Materials and methods : Knee MRIs of 38 children, ages 7.5–17.7 years (mean and median age 13 years), were retrospectively reviewed to look for features that might separate normal variants of ossification from stage-I OCD. These included age, gender, site, configuration of the lesion, residual cartilaginous model and presence of edema. Results : Twenty-three patients (32 condyles) had ossification defects with intact articular cartilage suggestive of stage-I lesions. No stage-II lesions were seen in the posterior femoral condyles. Accessory ossification centers were seen in 11/16 posterior condyles and 3/16 central condyles. Spiculation of existing ossification was seen in 12/16 posterior condylar lesions and 1/16 central condyles. There was a predominance of accessory ossifications and spiculations in the patients with 10% or greater residual cartilaginous model. No edema signal greater than diaphyseal red-marrow signal was seen in the posterior condyles. Clinical follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 38 months, with clinical improvement in 22 out of 23 patients. Conclusion : Inclusion of normal variants in the stage-I OCD category might explain, in part, the marked difference in published outcome between the juvenile and adult forms of OCD. Ossification defects in the posterior femoral condyles with intact overlying articular cartilage, accessory ossification centers, spiculation, residual cartilaginous model, and lack of bone-marrow edema are features of developmental variants rather than OCD.en_US
dc.format.extent464203 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherMRIen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmental Variantsen_US
dc.subject.otherKneeen_US
dc.subject.otherJuvenile Osteochondritis Dissecansen_US
dc.titleStage-I osteochondritis dissecans versus normal variants of ossification in the knee in childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumC.S. Mott Children’s Hospital/F3503, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0252, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumC.S. Mott Children’s Hospital/F3503, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0252, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid15940391en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46719/1/247_2005_Article_1507.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-1507-6en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePediatric Radiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.