Show simple item record

Importance of intra-therapy single-photon emission tomographic imaging in calculating tumour dosimetry for a lymphoma patient

dc.contributor.authorKaminski, Mark S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWahl, Richard L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKoral, Kenneth F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Isaac R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZasadny, Kenneth R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSwailem, Fayez M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBuchbinder, Steven F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:15:27Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:15:27Z
dc.date.issued1991-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationKoral, Kenneth F.; Zasadny, Kenneth R.; Swailem, Fayez M.; Buchbinder, Steven F.; Francis, Isaac R.; Kaminski, Mark S.; Wahl, Richard L.; (1991). "Importance of intra-therapy single-photon emission tomographic imaging in calculating tumour dosimetry for a lymphoma patient." European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 18(6): 432-435. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46832>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1619-7089en_US
dc.identifier.issn0340-6997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46832
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1879448&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe dosimetry for two, similarly sized tumours in a lymphoma patient being treated with non-bone marrow ablative, monoclonal antibody therapy is reported. The 45-year-old man was infused with 2.48 GBq (67 mCi) of 131 I-labelled MB-1. Prior to therapy, a time series of diagnostic conjugate-view images and a radionuclide transmission scan were obtained and processed to obtain time-activity curves. Starting 2 days after the therapeutic infusion of radioactivity, a second conjugate-view time series was obtained. At that time, a quantitative single-photon emission tomography (SPET) acquisition was also carried out. Pre- and post-therapy X-ray computed tomography scans demonstrated a percentage reduction in volume for the right tumour which was 3.8 times that for the left tumour. In contrast, diagnostic conjugate views by themselves estimated the absorbed dose to be the same for the two tumours. Addition of therapy conjugate-view data increased the right-over-left ratio but only to 1.22. Normalizing either time-activity series by the intra-therapy SPET results increased the ratio to greater than 1.5. We assume here that a differential dose is correct according to the differential tumour shirnkage. One can further assume that the largest ratio corresponds most certainly to the most accurate dosimetric method. Other assumptions are possible. While additional study is essential, data from this patient suggest that the preferred dosimetric method is intra-therapy SPET normalization of either time series.en_US
dc.format.extent412882 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherTumour Dosimetryen_US
dc.subject.otherLymphomaen_US
dc.subject.otherNuclear Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherImaging / Radiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherSingle-photon Emission Tomography (SPET) Quantificationen_US
dc.subject.otherMonoclonal Antibodyen_US
dc.subject.otherRadionuclide Therapyen_US
dc.titleImportance of intra-therapy single-photon emission tomographic imaging in calculating tumour dosimetry for a lymphoma patienten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, B16412 0028, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Division, B16412 0028, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Division, B16412 0028, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Division, B16412 0028, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; V.A. Medical Center, 85723, Tucson, AZ, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Division, B16412 0028, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Division, B16412 0028, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nuclear Medicine Division, B16412 0028, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid1879448en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46832/1/259_2005_Article_BF02258433.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02258433en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.