Show simple item record

An in vivo and in vitro trial of aclarubicin in metastatic breast cancer: a novel approach to the study of analogs

dc.contributor.authorSimon, Michael S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, Richard H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCody, Robert L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNatale, Ronald B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:23:10Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:23:10Z
dc.date.issued1993-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationNatale, Ronald B.; Cody, Robert L.; Simon, Michael S.; Wheeler, Richard H.; (1993). "An in vivo and in vitro trial of aclarubicin in metastatic breast cancer: a novel approach to the study of analogs." Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 31(6): 485-488. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46926>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-0843en_US
dc.identifier.issn0344-5704en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46926
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8453689&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractAclarubicin is an anthracycline antibiotic that differs from doxorubicin in its structure, mechanism of action, and preclinical toxicity profile, especially its reduced cardiotoxicity. We therefore conducted a side-by-side in vivo and in vitro trial of this agent in metastatic breast-cancer patients and their biopsied tumor specimens, respectively. Aclarubicin (100 mg/m 2 ) was given by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks to 22 patients with objectively measurable metastatic breast cancer, 15 of whom had not previously received doxorubicin. The dose-limiting toxicity consisted primarily of leukopenia and severe nausea and vomiting. No objective response was observed in the 19 evaluable patients. After disease progression, 10 of the 15 doxorubicin-naive patients were treated with doxorubicin; 6 patients achieved a partial response, including 4 who responded to doxorubicin alone and 2 who responded to doxorubicin in combination with thiotepa and vinblastine. Tumor specimens were obtained from 14 of the 22 patients prior to the start of therapy and were tested for in vitro sensitivity to aclarubicin and doxorubicin using a soft agar colony-forming assay. Adequate colony growth occurred in 9 of 14 cultured tumor specimens. All 9 specimens, including 3 obtained from doxorubicin-naive patients, demonstrated in vitro resistance to aclarubicin. In all, 1 of 3 specimens taken from doxorubicin-naive patients demonstrated in vitro sensitivity to doxorubicin, whereas 6 tumor specimens obtained from patients who had undergone prior doxorubicin therapy demonstrated in vitro resistance. The patient whose tumor demonstrated in vitro doxorubicin sensitivity responded to a doxorubicin regimen after failing aclarubicin treatment; in vitro doxorubicin resistance correlated with clinical resistance in all cases. We conclude that aclarubicin is inactive in metastatic breast cancer at the dose and schedule used. Side-by-side in vivo and in vitro trials are feasible and could be useful in the development of investigational agents with activity greater than that of aclarubicin and, particularly, in the evaluation of analogs of clinically active drugs.en_US
dc.format.extent438781 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherOncologyen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherPharmacology/Toxicologyen_US
dc.titleAn in vivo and in vitro trial of aclarubicin in metastatic breast cancer: a novel approach to the study of analogsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Box 0504, 48109-0504, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Box 0504, 48109-0504, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Box 0504, 48109-0504, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Box 0504, 48109-0504, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama in Birmingham, University Station, Birmingham, Alabama, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid8453689en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46926/1/280_2004_Article_BF00685040.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00685040en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.