Show simple item record

Combination vinorelbine and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer using a non-body surface area dosing scheme

dc.contributor.authorSchott, Anne F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Laurence H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRae, James Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Kent A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Daniel F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSterns, Vereden_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:23:40Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:23:40Z
dc.date.issued2006-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchott, Anne F.; Rae, James M.; Griffith, Kent A.; Hayes, Daniel F.; Sterns, Vered; Baker, Laurence H.; (2006). "Combination vinorelbine and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer using a non-body surface area dosing scheme." Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 58(1): 129-135. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46933>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0344-5704en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-0843en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46933
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16283312&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose : This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose of flat-dosed vinorelbine in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. At the time of study initiation, it was anticipated that vinorelbine would be developed as an oral capsule. A flat dosing scheme of both drugs was used to facilitate development of the oral regimen, and because neither drug’s clearance is associated with body surface area (BSA), pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic endpoints were explored. Experimental Design : Capecitabine was administered orally at 3,000 mg/day on days 1–14. The starting dose of vinorelbine was 20 mg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The vinorelbine dose was escalated until dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Vinorelbine pharmacokinetics were measured after the first dose. Patients underwent genotype analysis for polymorphisms in the CYP3A5 gene, and the erythromycin breath test (ERMBT), a phenotypic test of CYP3A enzyme activity. Results : Twenty five eligible patients were enrolled. Hematologic DLT was seen at the 50 and 45 mg vinorelbine doses; thus the recommended dose is 40 mg on days 1 and 8. Response rate was 30%, and disease stabilization rate was 64% (all dose levels included). Vinorelbine clearance was not associated with ERMBT, BSA, or age. CYP3A5 genotype in this small sample did not have an obvious relationship to clearance or toxicity. Conclusions : A non-BSA based dosing scheme of capecitabine and vinorelbine is safe and efficacious. BSA did not affect vinorelbine clearance. We recommend future studies with capecitabine and/or vinorelbine to compare the safety and efficacy of flat dosed versus BSA-dosed treatment.en_US
dc.format.extent318386 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherPhase I Clinical Trialen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.otherGenotype–Phenotype Correlationsen_US
dc.subject.otherErythromycin Breath Testen_US
dc.titleCombination vinorelbine and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer using a non-body surface area dosing schemeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRadiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, C349 MIB, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0848, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, C349 MIB, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0848, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, C349 MIB, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0848, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBreast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, C349 MIB, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0848, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid16283312en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46933/1/280_2005_Article_132.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0132-2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.