Chloroplast DNA evolution among legumes: Loss of a large inverted repeat occurred prior to other sequence rearrangements
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, Jeffrey D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Osorio, Bernardita | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Aldrich, Jane | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, William F. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T18:25:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T18:25:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1987-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Palmer, Jeffrey D.; Osorio, Bernardita; Aldrich, Jane; Thompson, William F.; (1987). "Chloroplast DNA evolution among legumes: Loss of a large inverted repeat occurred prior to other sequence rearrangements." Current Genetics 11(4): 275-286. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46960> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0172-8083 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-0983 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/46960 | |
dc.description.abstract | We have compared the sequence organization of four previously uncharacterized legume chloroplast DNAs - from alfalfa, lupine, wisteria and subclover — to that of legume chloroplast DNAs that either retain a large, ribosomal RNA-encoding inverted repeat (mung bean) or have deleted one half of this repeat (broad bean). The circular, 126 kilobase pair (kb) alfalfa chloroplast genome, like those of broad bean and pea, lacks any detectable repeated sequences and contains only a single set of ribosomal RNA genes. However, in contrast to broad bean and pea, alfalfa chloroplast DNA is unrearranged (except for the deletion of one segment of the inverted repeat) relative to chloroplast DNA from mung bean. Together with other findings reported here, these results allow us to determine which of the four possible inverted repeat configurations was deleted in the alfalfa-pea-broad bean lineage, and to show how the present-day broad bean genome may have been derived from an alfalfa-like ancestral genome by two major sequence inversions. The 147 kb lupine chloroplast genome contains a 22 kb inverted repeat and has essentially complete colinearity with the mung bean genome. In contrast, the 130 kb wisteria genome has deleted one half of the inverted repeat and appears colinear with the alfalfa genome. The 140 kb subclover genome has been extensively rearranged and contains a family of at least five dispersed repetitive sequence elements, each several hundred by in size; this is the first report of dispersed repeats of this size in a land plant chloroplast genome. We conclude that the inverted repeat has been lost only once among legumes and that this loss occurred prior to all the other rearrangements observed in subclover, broad bean and pea. Of those lineages that lack the inverted repeat, some are stable and unrearranged, other have undergone a moderate amount of rearrangement, while still others have sustained a complex series of rearrangement either with or without major sequence duplications and transpositions. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1452563 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Repeated Sequence | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Life Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Proteomics | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Plant Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Inverted Repeat | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Chloroplast Genome Evolution | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Biochemistry, General | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Cell Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Microbial Genetics and Genomics | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Inversion | en_US |
dc.title | Chloroplast DNA evolution among legumes: Loss of a large inverted repeat occurred prior to other sequence rearrangements | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resources and Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Biology, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 290 Panama Street, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA; 271 Hill Crest Road, 19087, Stafford, PA, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 290 Panama Street, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Botany, North Carolina State University, 27695, Raleigh, NC, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | The Standard Oil Company, 4440 Warrensville Center Road, 44128, Cleveland, OH, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46960/1/294_2004_Article_BF00355401.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00355401 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Current Genetics | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.