Show simple item record

Interval appendectomy in perforated appendicitis

dc.contributor.authorCoran, Arnold G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDrongowski, Robert A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHirschl, Ronald B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Avivaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeiner, Daniel J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:38:45Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:38:45Z
dc.date.issued1995-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationWeiner, Daniel J.; Katz, Aviva; Hirschl, Ronald B.; Drongowski, Robert; Coran, Arnold G.; (1995). "Interval appendectomy in perforated appendicitis." Pediatric Surgery International 10 (2-3): 82-85. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47148>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0179-0358en_US
dc.identifier.issn1437-9813en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47148
dc.description.abstractThe treatment of the perforated appendix remains controversial, with the optimal timing of surgical intervention unclear. Previous studies have documented an increase in both minor and major complication rates in patients undergoing appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. We sought to evaluate the nonoperative therapy of perforated appendicitis followed by interval appendectomy. The charts of all children undergoing admission for appendicitis during a 10-year period (n = 480) were reviewed. Data were abstracted regarding patient presentation, laboratory and radiologic findings, operative and pathology reports, and postoperative course in those patients with perforated appendicitis (n = 104). Comparisons were made between patients undergoing primary appendectomy for perforated appendicitis (n = 87) and those treated with IV antibiotics and hydration and then scheduled for interval appendectomy 4 to 6 weeks following the acute event (n = 17). Treatment assignment was determined by the attending pediatric surgeon in a non-randomized fashion. No significant differences were seen between these two groups in days of antibiotic treatment, nasogastric decompression, and IV hydration. Additionally, total hospital days and cost did not differ significantly between the two groups (primary = 10.3 days and $10,550; interval = 13.3 days and $13,221, P = 0.11 and 0.21, respectively). The overall complication rates, 12.6% in the primary group and 5.9% in the interval group, also did not differ significantly, while the major complication rate (wound dehiscence, abscess, and small-bowel obstruction), 10% versus 0%, was significantly higher in the primary group as compared with the interval group. Our data demonstrate no significant disadvantage, and possibly an improvement in the major complication rate, with nonoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis followed by interval appendectomy. We suggest that this treatment modality should be considered when evaluating the child with perforated appendicitis.en_US
dc.format.extent403966 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherPerforationen_US
dc.subject.otherAppendicitisen_US
dc.subject.otherPediatric Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.otherSurgeryen_US
dc.subject.otherManagement Childen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherPediatricsen_US
dc.titleInterval appendectomy in perforated appendicitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSection of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSection of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSection of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Surgery, A. I. duPont Institute, P. O. Box 269, 19803, Wilmington, DE, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47148/1/383_2004_Article_BF00171160.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00171160en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePediatric Surgery Internationalen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.