Show simple item record

The relation of the formation of lipofuscin to the distribution of oxidative enzymes in the human brain

dc.contributor.authorFriede, Reinhard L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:43:46Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:43:46Z
dc.date.issued1962-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationFriede, Reinhard L.; (1962). "The relation of the formation of lipofuscin to the distribution of oxidative enzymes in the human brain." Acta Neuropathologica 2(2): 113-125. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47222>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6322en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-0533en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47222
dc.description.abstractThe extent of deposition of lipofuscin in 66 nuclei of the aged human brain was classified systematically and the data were compared with the distribution of certain oxidative enzymes (succinic dehydrogenase, DPN-diaphorase). Nerve cells characterized by strong activity of oxidative enzymes in their perikarya contained more lipofuscin in aged brains than nerve cells characterized by little enzyme activity. The normal gradations of enzymatic (and probably metabolic) activity among cells thus predetermined—to a certain extent—the later deposition of lipofuscin. The lipofuscin in the neuropil (dendrite branchings) did not show the clear-cut relation to enzyme activity which characterized the perikarya; there was some indication of removal of lipofuscin from neuropil. A correlation between functional activity, oxidative enzymatic activity and deposition of lipofuscin was suggested by the findings in two cases in which, following the removal of one eye, alternate layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus showed a marked decrease of DPN-diaphorase activity and decreased presence of lipofuscin. The presence of “wear and tear” pigment, therefore, appeared related to the functional “wear and tear” of a given region which is reflected by the intensity of oxidative metabolism. Cytological studies, on the other hand, did not imply a more specific association of lipofuscin with oxidative enzyme activity. Das Ausmaß der Lipofuscinablagerung in 66 Kernen des gealterten menschlichen Gehirns wurde systematisch klassifiziert und die Ergebnisse wurden mit der Verteilung gewisser oxydativer Enzyme (Succinodehydrogenase, DPN-diaphorase) verglichen. Nervenzellen mit starker Aktivität der oxydativen Enzyme in den Perikarya wiesen mit zunehmendem Alter größere Lipofuscinansammlungen auf als Nervenzellen mit geringer Aktivität in den Perikarya. Daraus ist zu sehen, daß die Menge der späteren Lipofuscinablagerungen in gewissem Maße durch die normalen Unterschiede zwischen der enzymatischen (und vielleicht metabolischen) Tätigkeit der einzelnen Zellen bestimmt wird. Das im Neuropil (in den Dendritenverzweigungen) gebildete Lipofuscin scheint aus dem Gewebe abtransportiert zu werden; es zeigt daher nicht das deutlich sichtbare Verhältnis zur Enzymaktivität, wie es für die Perikarya charakteristisch ist.en_US
dc.format.extent2159717 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicine & Public Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherPathologyen_US
dc.titleThe relation of the formation of lipofuscin to the distribution of oxidative enzymes in the human brainen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPathologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMental Health Research Institute and Laboratory of Neuropathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47222/1/401_2004_Article_BF00685170.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00685170en_US
dc.identifier.sourceActa Neuropathologicaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.