Show simple item record

An evaluation of garnet-clinopyroxene geothermometry in granulites

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Craig A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBohlen, Steven R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEssene, Eric J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:51:35Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:51:35Z
dc.date.issued1983-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, Craig A.; Bohlen, Steven R.; Essene, Eric J.; (1983). "An evaluation of garnet-clinopyroxene geothermometry in granulites." Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 84 (2-3): 191-198. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47336>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0010-7999en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-0967en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47336
dc.description.abstractFour new formulations of the garnet-clinopyroxene geothermometer (Ellis and Green 1979; Ganguly 1979; Saxena 1979; Dahl 1980) have been evaluated in the Adirondacks and five other granulite terranes using results from 94 mineral pairs. The Saxena and Ganguly formulations give temperatures that are generally 100–150° C above those constrained by phase equilibria and other independent thermometry while the empirical calibration of Dahl gives widely scattered, erratic results. Despite some scatter in the data, the Ellis and Green calibration appears to be more accurate and precise than the others and is the most useful garnet-clinopyroxene thermometer currently available for quantitative thermometry in granulites. All four formulations are sensitive to large variations (>70–80° C) in temperature suggesting that problems with accuracy and precision can be improved with further refinement of model-based aspects of the thermometers.en_US
dc.format.extent1175345 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherMineralogyen_US
dc.subject.otherMineral Resourcesen_US
dc.subject.otherGeologyen_US
dc.subject.otherGeosciencesen_US
dc.titleAn evaluation of garnet-clinopyroxene geothermometry in granulitesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeology and Earth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Geological Sciences, The University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, 06520, New Haven, Connecticut, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Geological Sciences, The University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Earth and Space Sciences, State University of New York, 11794, Stony Brook, New York, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47336/1/410_2004_Article_BF00371285.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00371285en_US
dc.identifier.sourceContributions to Mineralogy and Petrologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.