Show simple item record

Radiographic outcomes among South African coal miners

dc.contributor.authorWhite, Neilen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, Rajen N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobins, Thomas G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFranzblau, Alfreden_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T18:57:06Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T18:57:06Z
dc.date.issued2004-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationNaidoo, Rajen N.; Robins, Thomas G.; Solomon, A.; White, Neil; Franzblau, Alfred; (2004). "Radiographic outcomes among South African coal miners." International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 77(7): 471-481. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47414>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1246en_US
dc.identifier.issn0340-0131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47414
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15558299&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives : This study, the first to document the prevalence of pneumoconiosis among a living South African coal mining cohort, describes dose–response relationships between coal workers’ pneumoconiosis and respirable dust exposure, and relationships between pneumoconiosis and both lung function deterioration and respiratory symptoms. Methods : A total of 684 current miners and 188 ex-miners from three bituminous-coal mines in Mpumalanga, South Africa, was studied. Chest radiographs were read according to the International Labour Organization (ILO) classification by two experienced readers, one an accredited National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) “B” reader. Interviews were conducted to assess symptoms, work histories (also obtained from company records), smoking, and other risk factors. Spirometry was performed by trained technicians. Cumulative respirable dust exposure (CDE) estimates were constructed from historical company-collected sampling and researcher-collected personal dust measurements. κ-Statistics compared the radiographic outcomes predicted by the two readers. An average profusion score was used in the analysis for the outcomes of interest. Because of possible confounding by employment status, most analyses were stratified on current and ex-miner status. Results : The overall prevalence of pneumoconiosis was low (2%–4%). The degree of agreement between the two readers for profusion was moderate to high (κ=0.58). A significant association ( P <0.001) and trend ( P <0.001) was seen for pneumoconiosis with increasing categories of CDE among current miners only. A significant ( P <0.0001) additional 58 mg-years/m 3 CDE was seen among those with pneumoconiosis compared to those without. CDE contributed to a statistically significant 0.19% and 0.11% greater decline in the percent predicted 1-second forced expiration volume (FEV 1 ) and forced vital capacity (FVC), respectively, among current miners with pneumoconiosis than among those without. Logistic regression models showed no significant relationships between pneumoconiosis and symptoms. Conclusions : The overall prevalence of pneumoconiosis, although significantly associated with CDE, was low. The presence of pneumoconiosis is associated with meaningful health effects, including deterioration in lung function. Intervention measures that control exposure are indicated, to reduce these functional effects.en_US
dc.format.extent390307 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherPneumoconiosisen_US
dc.subject.otherChest Radiographsen_US
dc.subject.otherRespirable Dusten_US
dc.subject.otherMedicineen_US
dc.subject.otherCumulative Exposureen_US
dc.subject.otherCoal Minesen_US
dc.subject.otherLung Functionen_US
dc.titleRadiographic outcomes among South African coal minersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health/ Department of Community Health, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X7, Congella, 4013, South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Institute for Occupational Health, Johannesburg, South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRespiratory Clinic, Groote Schuur Hospital/Occupational and Environmental Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur, South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid15558299en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47414/1/420_2004_Article_532.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-004-0532-3en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Healthen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.