Show simple item record

Microbial community utilization of recalcitrant and simple carbon compounds: impact of oak-woodland plant communities

dc.contributor.authorWaldrop, Mark P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFirestone, Mary K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:17:34Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:17:34Z
dc.date.issued2004-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationWaldrop, Mark P.; Firestone, Mary K.; (2004). "Microbial community utilization of recalcitrant and simple carbon compounds: impact of oak-woodland plant communities." Oecologia 138(2): 275-284. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47700>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-8549en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47700
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14614618&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractLittle is known about how the structure of microbial communities impacts carbon cycling or how soil microbial community composition mediates plant effects on C-decomposition processes. We examined the degradation of four 13 C-labeled compounds (starch, xylose, vanillin, and pine litter), quantified rates of associated enzyme activities, and identified microbial groups utilizing the 13 C-labeled substrates in soils under oaks and in adjacent open grasslands. By quantifying increases in non- 13 C-labeled carbon in microbial biomarkers, we were also able to identify functional groups responsible for the metabolism of indigenous soil organic matter. Although microbial community composition differed between oak and grassland soils, the microbial groups responsible for starch, xylose, and vanillin degradation, as defined by 13 C-PLFA, did not differ significantly between oak and grassland soils. Microbial groups responsible for pine litter and SOM-C degradation did differ between the two soils. Enhanced degradation of SOM resulting from substrate addition (priming) was greater in grassland soils, particularly in response to pine litter addition; under these conditions, fungal and Gram + biomarkers showed more incorporation of SOM-C than did Gram – biomarkers. In contrast, the oak soil microbial community primarily incorporated C from the added substrates. More 13 C (from both simple and recalcitrant sources) was incorporated into the Gram – biomarkers than Gram + biomarkers despite the fact that the Gram + group generally comprised a greater portion of the bacterial biomass than did markers for the Gram – group. These experiments begin to identify components of the soil microbial community responsible for decomposition of different types of C-substrates. The results demonstrate that the presence of distinctly different plant communities did not alter the microbial community profile responsible for decomposition of relatively labile C-substrates but did alter the profiles of microbial communities responsible for decomposition of the more recalcitrant substrates, pine litter and indigenous soil organic matter.en_US
dc.format.extent219341 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherEnzyme Activitiesen_US
dc.subject.otherSoil Carbon Cyclingen_US
dc.subject.other13 C-phospholipid Fatty Acid Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherLifeSciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMicrobial Community Compositionen_US
dc.titleMicrobial community utilization of recalcitrant and simple carbon compounds: impact of oak-woodland plant communitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, 151 Hilgard Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA; School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 430 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, 151 Hilgard Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid14614618en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47700/1/442_2003_Article_1419.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1419-9en_US
dc.identifier.sourceOecologiaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.