Performance of a generalist grasshopper on a C 3 and a C 4 grass: compensation for the effects of elevated CO 2 on plant nutritional quality
dc.contributor.author | Barbehenn, Raymond V. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Zhong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Karowe, David N. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-11T19:17:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-11T19:17:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Barbehenn, Raymond V.; Karowe, David N.; Chen, Zhong; (2004). "Performance of a generalist grasshopper on a C 3 and a C 4 grass: compensation for the effects of elevated CO 2 on plant nutritional quality." Oecologia 140(1): 96-103. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47704> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-1939 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0029-8549 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47704 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15069636&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The increasing CO 2 concentration in Earth’s atmosphere is expected to cause a greater decline in the nutritional quality of C 3 than C 4 plants. As a compensatory response, herbivorous insects may increase their feeding disproportionately on C 3 plants. These hypotheses were tested by growing the grasses Lolium multiflorum C 3 ) and Bouteloua curtipendula C 4 ) at ambient (370 ppm) and elevated (740 ppm) CO 2 levels in open top chambers in the field, and comparing the growth and digestive efficiencies of the generalist grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes on each of the four plant × CO 2 treatment combinations. As expected, the nutritional quality of the C 3 grass declined to a greater extent than did that of the C 4 grass at elevated CO 2 ; protein levels declined in the C 3 grass, while levels of carbohydrates (sugar, fructan and starch) increased. However, M. sanguinipes did not significantly increase its consumption rate to compensate for the lower nutritional quality of the C 3 grass grown under elevated CO 2 . Instead, these grasshoppers appear to use post-ingestive mechanisms to maintain their growth rates on the C 3 grass under elevated CO 2 . Consumption rates of the C 3 and C 4 grasses were also similar, demonstrating a lack of compensatory feeding on the C 4 grass. We also examined the relative efficiencies of nutrient utilization from a C 3 and C 4 grass by M. sanguinipes to test the basis for the C 4 plant avoidance hypothesis. Contrary to this hypothesis, neither protein nor sugar was digested with a lower efficiency from the C 4 grass than from the C 3 grass. A novel finding of this study is that fructan, a potentially large carbohydrate source in C 3 grasses, is utilized by grasshoppers. Based on the higher nutrient levels in the C 3 grass and the better growth performance of M. sanguinipes on this grass at both CO 2 levels, we conclude that C 3 grasses are likely to remain better host plants than C 4 grasses in future CO 2 conditions. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 150954 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3115 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | en_US |
dc.subject.other | LifeSciences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Melanoplus Sanguinipes (Grasshopper) | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Nutrient | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Bouteloua Curtipendula C 4 Grass) | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Digestion | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Lolium Multiflorum C 3 Grass) | en_US |
dc.title | Performance of a generalist grasshopper on a C 3 and a C 4 grass: compensation for the effects of elevated CO 2 on plant nutritional quality | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resources and Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Departments of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5410, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5018, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15069636 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47704/1/442_2004_Article_1555.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1555-x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Oecologia | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.