Show simple item record

Performance of a generalist grasshopper on a C 3 and a C 4 grass: compensation for the effects of elevated CO 2 on plant nutritional quality

dc.contributor.authorBarbehenn, Raymond V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Zhongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarowe, David N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:17:50Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:17:50Z
dc.date.issued2004-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationBarbehenn, Raymond V.; Karowe, David N.; Chen, Zhong; (2004). "Performance of a generalist grasshopper on a C 3 and a C 4 grass: compensation for the effects of elevated CO 2 on plant nutritional quality." Oecologia 140(1): 96-103. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47704>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-8549en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47704
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15069636&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe increasing CO 2 concentration in Earth’s atmosphere is expected to cause a greater decline in the nutritional quality of C 3 than C 4 plants. As a compensatory response, herbivorous insects may increase their feeding disproportionately on C 3 plants. These hypotheses were tested by growing the grasses Lolium multiflorum C 3 ) and Bouteloua curtipendula C 4 ) at ambient (370 ppm) and elevated (740 ppm) CO 2 levels in open top chambers in the field, and comparing the growth and digestive efficiencies of the generalist grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes on each of the four plant × CO 2 treatment combinations. As expected, the nutritional quality of the C 3 grass declined to a greater extent than did that of the C 4 grass at elevated CO 2 ; protein levels declined in the C 3 grass, while levels of carbohydrates (sugar, fructan and starch) increased. However, M. sanguinipes did not significantly increase its consumption rate to compensate for the lower nutritional quality of the C 3 grass grown under elevated CO 2 . Instead, these grasshoppers appear to use post-ingestive mechanisms to maintain their growth rates on the C 3 grass under elevated CO 2 . Consumption rates of the C 3 and C 4 grasses were also similar, demonstrating a lack of compensatory feeding on the C 4 grass. We also examined the relative efficiencies of nutrient utilization from a C 3 and C 4 grass by M. sanguinipes to test the basis for the C 4 plant avoidance hypothesis. Contrary to this hypothesis, neither protein nor sugar was digested with a lower efficiency from the C 4 grass than from the C 3 grass. A novel finding of this study is that fructan, a potentially large carbohydrate source in C 3 grasses, is utilized by grasshoppers. Based on the higher nutrient levels in the C 3 grass and the better growth performance of M. sanguinipes on this grass at both CO 2 levels, we conclude that C 3 grasses are likely to remain better host plants than C 4 grasses in future CO 2 conditions.en_US
dc.format.extent150954 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherLifeSciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMelanoplus Sanguinipes (Grasshopper)en_US
dc.subject.otherNutrienten_US
dc.subject.otherBouteloua Curtipendula C 4 Grass)en_US
dc.subject.otherDigestionen_US
dc.subject.otherLolium Multiflorum C 3 Grass)en_US
dc.titlePerformance of a generalist grasshopper on a C 3 and a C 4 grass: compensation for the effects of elevated CO 2 on plant nutritional qualityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5410, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5018, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid15069636en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47704/1/442_2004_Article_1555.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1555-xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceOecologiaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.