Show simple item record

Optimal central-place foraging by beavers: Tree-size selection in relation to defensive chemicals of quaking aspen

dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Stephen H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBasey, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBusher, Peter E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:22:42Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:22:42Z
dc.date.issued1988-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBasey, John M.; Jenkins, Stephen H.; Busher, Peter E.; (1988). "Optimal central-place foraging by beavers: Tree-size selection in relation to defensive chemicals of quaking aspen." Oecologia 76(2): 278-282. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47775>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-8549en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47775
dc.description.abstractAt a newly occupied pond, beavers preferentially felled aspen smaller than 7.5 cm in diameter and selected against larger size classes. After one year of cutting, 10% of the aspen had been cut and 14% of the living aspen exhibited the juvenile growth form. A phenolic compound which may act as a deterrent to beavers was found in low concentrations in aspen bark, and there was no significant regression of relative concentration of this compound on tree diameter. At a pond which had been intermittently occupied by beavers for over 20 years, beavers selected against aspen smaller than 4.5 cm in diameter, and selected in favor of aspen larger than 19.5 cm in diameter. After more than 28 years of cutting at this site, 51% of the aspen had been cut and 49% of the living aspen were juvenileform. The phenolic compound was found in significantly higher concentrations in aspen bark than at the newly occupied site, and there was a significant negative regression of relative concentration on tree diameter. The results of this study show that responses to browsing by trees place constraints on the predictive value of standard energy-based optimal foraging models, and limitations on the use of such models. Future models should attempt to account for inducible responses of plants to damage and increases in concentrations of secondary metabolites through time.en_US
dc.format.extent623154 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherPopulus Tremuloidesen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCastor Canadensisen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Defenseen_US
dc.subject.otherCentral-place Foragingen_US
dc.subject.otherOptimal Foragingen_US
dc.subject.otherJuvenile-form Plantsen_US
dc.titleOptimal central-place foraging by beavers: Tree-size selection in relation to defensive chemicals of quaking aspenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, 89557, Reno, NV, USA; School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, 89557, Reno, NV, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCollege of Basic Studies, Boston University, 871 Commonwealth Avenue, 02215, Boston, MA, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47775/1/442_2004_Article_BF00379963.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00379963en_US
dc.identifier.sourceOecologiaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.