Show simple item record

Nitrogen mineralization, nitrification and denitrification in upland and wetland ecosystems

dc.contributor.authorZak, Donald R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrigal, David F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:23:49Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:23:49Z
dc.date.issued1991-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationZak, Donald R.; Grigal, David F.; (1991). "Nitrogen mineralization, nitrification and denitrification in upland and wetland ecosystems." Oecologia 88(2): 189-196. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47791>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-8549en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47791
dc.description.abstractNitrogen mineralization, nitrification, denitrification, and microbial biomass were evaluated in four representative ecosystems in east-central Minnesota. The study ecosystems included: old field, swamp forest, savanna, and upland pin oak forest. Due to a high regional water table and permeable soils, the upland and wetland ecosystems were separated by relatively short distances (2 to 5 m). Two randomly selected sites within each ecosystem were sampled for an entire growing season. Soil samples were collected at 5-week intervals to determine rates of N cycling processes and changes in microbial biomass. Mean daily N mineralization rates during five-week in situ soil incubations were significantly different among sampling dates and ecosystems. The highest annual rates were measured in the upland pin oak ecosystem (8.6 g N m −2 yr −1 ), and the lowest rates in the swamp forest (1.5 g N m −2 yr −1 ); nitrification followed an identical pattern. Denitrification was relatively high in the swamp forest during early spring (8040 μg N 2 O−N m −2 d −1 ) and late autumn (2525 μg N 2 O−N m −2 d −1 ); nitrification occurred at rates sufficient to sustain these losses. In the well-drained uplands, rates of denitrification were generally lower and equivalent to rates of atmospheric N inputs. Microbial C and N were consistently higher in the swamp forest than in the other ecosystems; both were positively correlated with average daily rates of N mineralization. In the subtle landscape of east-central Minnesota, rates of N cycling can differ by an order of magnitude across relatively short distances.en_US
dc.format.extent1006076 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherSpatial Variabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherMicrobial Biomassen_US
dc.subject.otherDenitrificationen_US
dc.subject.otherNitrificationen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherN Mineralizationen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.titleNitrogen mineralization, nitrification and denitrification in upland and wetland ecosystemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Soil Science, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA; Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA; School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47791/1/442_2004_Article_BF00320810.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00320810en_US
dc.identifier.sourceOecologiaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.