Show simple item record

Effects of spines and thorns on Australian arid zone herbivores of different body masses

dc.contributor.authorSchmitz, Oswald J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBelovsky, Gary E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSlade, J. B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDawson, T. J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:24:05Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:24:05Z
dc.date.issued1991-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationBelovsky, Gary E.; Schmitz, Oswald J.; Slade, J. B.; Dawson, T. J.; (1991). "Effects of spines and thorns on Australian arid zone herbivores of different body masses." Oecologia 88(4): 521-528. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47795>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-8549en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/47795
dc.description.abstractWe investigated the effects of thorns and spines on the feeding of 5 herbivore species in arid Australia. The herbivores were the rabbit ( Oryctolagus cuniculus ), euro kangaroo ( Macropus robustus ), red kangaroo ( Macropus rufus ), sheep ( Ovis aries ), and cattle ( Bos taurus ). Five woody plants without spines or thorns and 6 woody plants with thorns were included in the study. The spines and thorns were not found to affect the herbivores' rates of feeding (items ingested/min), but they did reduce the herbivores' rates of biomass ingestion (g-dry/item). The reduction in biomass ingested occurred in two ways: at a given diameter, twigs with spines and thorns had less mass than undefended plants, and the herbivores consumed twigs with smaller diameters on plants with spines and thorns. The relative importance of the two ways that twigs with spines and thorns provided less biomass varied with herbivore body mass. Reduced twig mass was more important for small herbivores, while large herbivores selected smaller diameters. The effectiveness of spines and thorns as anti-herbivore defenses did not vary with the evolutionary history of the herbivores (i.e. native vs. introduced). Spines and thorns mainly affected the herbivores' selection of maximum twig sizes (reducing diameter and mass), but the minimum twig sizes selected were also reduced.en_US
dc.format.extent886970 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Defensesen_US
dc.subject.otherPlantanimal Interactionsen_US
dc.subject.otherAustralia, Kangaroosen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherHerbivoryen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.titleEffects of spines and thorns on Australian arid zone herbivores of different body massesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, The University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; School of Natural Resources, The University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, 84322-5210, Logan, UT, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources, The University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, 84322-5210, Logan, UT, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources, The University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, V6T 2A9, Vancouver, B. C., Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Biological Sciences, University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 1, 2033, Kensington, N.S.W., Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47795/1/442_2004_Article_BF00317715.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00317715en_US
dc.identifier.sourceOecologiaen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.