Show simple item record

Structural rearrangements, including parallel inversions, within the chloroplast genome of Anemone and related genera

dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Jeffrey D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHoot, Sara B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:41:55Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:41:55Z
dc.date.issued1994-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationHoot, Sara B.; Palmer, Jeffrey D.; (1994). "Structural rearrangements, including parallel inversions, within the chloroplast genome of Anemone and related genera." Journal of Molecular Evolution 38(3): 274-281. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/48047>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1432en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-2844en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/48047
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8006994&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractChloroplast DNA cleavage sites for 10 restriction enzymes were mapped for 46 species representing all sections of Anemone , four closely related genera ( Clematis, Pulsatilla, Hepatica , and Knowltonia ), and three more distantly related outgroups (Caltha, Ranunculus , and Adonis ). Comparison of the maps revealed that the chloroplast genomes of Anemone and related genera have sustained an unusual number and variety of rearrangements. A single inversion of a 42-kb segment was found in the large single-copy region of Adonis aestivalis . Two types of rearrangements were found in the chloroplast genome of Clematis , Anemone, Pulsatilla, Hepatica , and Knowltonia : An approximately 4-kb expansion of the inverted repeat and four inversions within the large single-copy region. These rearrangements support the monophyletic status of these genera, clearly separating them from Caltha, Ranunculus , and Adonis . Two further inversions were found in two Clematis species and three Anemone species. While appearing to support a monophyletic grouping for these taxa, these two inversions conflict with data from both chloroplast restriction sites and morphology and are better interpreted as having occurred twice independently. These are the first two documented cases of homoplastic inversions in chloroplast DNA. Finally, the second intron of the chloroplast rps12 gene was shown to have been lost in the common ancestor of the same three Anemone species that feature the two homoplastic inversions.en_US
dc.format.extent963734 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.subject.otherRearrangementsen_US
dc.subject.otherChloroplast DNAen_US
dc.subject.otherInversionsen_US
dc.subject.otherHomoplasyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMicrobiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCell Biologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherIntron Lossen_US
dc.subject.otherAnemone Complexen_US
dc.subject.otherRanunculaceaeen_US
dc.titleStructural rearrangements, including parallel inversions, within the chloroplast genome of Anemone and related generaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Herbarium, North University Building, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, 60605, Chicago, IL, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 47405, Bloomington, IN, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid8006994en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/48047/1/239_2004_Article_BF00176089.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00176089en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Molecular Evolutionen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.