Show simple item record

Analytic evaluation of contention protocols used in distributed real-time systems

dc.contributor.authorShin, Kang G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHou, Chao-Juen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-11T19:45:27Z
dc.date.available2006-09-11T19:45:27Z
dc.date.issued1995-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationShin, Kang; Hou, Chao-Ju; (1995). "Analytic evaluation of contention protocols used in distributed real-time systems." Real-Time Systems 9(1): 69-107. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/48090>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0922-6443en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-1383en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/48090
dc.description.abstractThe probability of a station failing to deliver packets before their deadlines, called the probability of dynamic failure, P dyn , is an important measure for the communication subsystem of a distributed real-time system. Another closely-related performance measure is the ε- bounded delivery time , T ε , which is defined as the least time needed to deliver a packet with probability greater than 1−ε. Using P dyn and T ε , we comparatively evaluate four contention protocols often used in distributed real-time systems: (i) the token passing protocol and its priority-based variation (called the token scheduling protocol ), and (ii) the P i -persistent protocol and a priority-based variation thereof. The communication subsystem equipped with different contention protocols is modeled first as embedded Markov chains. Then, we derive the probability distributions of access delay, from which P dyn and T ε can be calculated. The blocking probability, Q i , can also be derived from the access delay distribution. These measures are derived first under the assumption of a single buffer at each station. The single-buffer model is then extended to the multiple-buffer case. The effects of buffer size on P dyn , T ε , and Q i , and the performance improvement with multiple buffers are analyzed over a wide range of network traffic.en_US
dc.format.extent2469158 bytes
dc.format.extent3115 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers; Springer Science+Business Mediaen_US
dc.subject.otherComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherPerformance and Reliabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherProcessor Architecturesen_US
dc.subject.otherSpecial Purpose and Application-Based Systemsen_US
dc.subject.otherSystem Performance and Evaluationen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunications Engineering, Networksen_US
dc.subject.otherControl Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherDeadlinesen_US
dc.subject.otherReal-time Systemsen_US
dc.subject.otherContention Protocolsen_US
dc.subject.otherAccess Delayen_US
dc.subject.otherEmbedded Markov Chainsen_US
dc.subject.otherQueueing Theoryen_US
dc.subject.otherPerformance Metricsen_US
dc.subject.otherPerformance Evaluationen_US
dc.titleAnalytic evaluation of contention protocols used in distributed real-time systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumReal-Time Computing Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Michigan, 48105-2122, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Wisconsin — Madison, 53706-1691, Madison, WIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/48090/1/11241_2005_Article_BF01094173.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01094173en_US
dc.identifier.sourceReal-Time Systemsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.