Is the Value Spread a Useful Predictor of Returns?
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Lu | |
dc.contributor | Lu, Naiping | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-10-12T19:33:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-10-12T19:33:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-09 | |
dc.identifier | 1051 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/48729 | |
dc.description.abstract | No. Two related variables, the book-to-market spread (the book-to-market of value stocks minus the book-to-market of growth stocks) and the market-to-book spread (the market-to-book of growth stocks minus the market-to-book of value stocks) predict returns but with opposite signs. The value spread mixes the cyclical variations of the book-to-market and market-to-book spreads, and appear much less useful in predicting returns. Our evidence casts doubt on recent studies that rely critically on using the value spread to predict aggregate stock returns. | en |
dc.format.extent | 284451 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject | The Value Spread | en |
dc.subject | Predictability | en |
dc.subject | Business Cycles | en |
dc.subject.classification | Finance | en |
dc.title | Is the Value Spread a Useful Predictor of Returns? | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Ross School of Business | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Pennsylvania - Statistics Department | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/48729/1/1051-Lu.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Business, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
Accessibility: If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.