Show simple item record

A Monte Carlo investigation of dual-energy-window scatter correction for volume-of-interest quantification in 99Tcm SPECT

dc.contributor.authorLuo, Jian-Qiaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoral, Kenneth F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLjungberg, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorFloyd, C. E. Jren_US
dc.contributor.authorJaszczak, R. J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-19T19:02:44Z
dc.date.available2006-12-19T19:02:44Z
dc.date.issued1995-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationLuo, Jian-Qiao; Koral, K F; Ljungberg, M; Floyd, C E Jr; Jaszczak, R J (1995). "A Monte Carlo investigation of dual-energy-window scatter correction for volume-of-interest quantification in 99Tcm SPECT." Physics in Medicine and Biology. 40(1): 181-199. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/48959>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031-9155en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/48959
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7708840&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractUsing Monte Carlo simulation of 99Tcm single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), the authors investigate the effects of tissue-background activity, tumour location, patient size, uncertainty of energy windows, and definition of tumour region on the accuracy of quantification. The dual-energy-window method of correction for Compton scattering is employed and the multiplier which yields correct activity for the volume-of-interest (VOI) as a whole calculated. The model is usually a sphere containing radioactive water located within a cylinder filled with a more dilute solution of radioactivity. Two simulation codes are employed. Reconstruction is by ML-EM algorithm with attenuation compensation. The scatter multiplier depends only slightly on the sphere location or the cylinder diameter. It also depends little on whether correction is before or after reconstruction. At low background level, it changes with VOI size, but not at higher background. For a geometrical VOI, it is 1.25 at zero background, decreases sharply to 0.56 for equal concentrations, and is 0.44 when the background concentration is very large. Quantification is accurate (less than 9% error) if the test background is reasonably close to that used in setting the universal scatter-multiplier value, or if the rest backgrounds are always large and so is the universal-value background, but not if the test backgrounds cover a large range of values including zero. Results largely agree with those from experiment after the experimental data with background is re-evaluated with prejudice.en_US
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.extent846038 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltden_US
dc.titleA Monte Carlo investigation of dual-energy-window scatter correction for volume-of-interest quantification in 99Tcm SPECTen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDiv. of Nucl. Med., Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDiv. of Nucl. Med., Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDiv. of Nucl. Med., Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDiv. of Nucl. Med., Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDiv. of Nucl. Med., Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid7708840en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/48959/2/pb950115.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/40/1/015en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePhysics in Medicine and Biology.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.