Show simple item record

COMMENT: Reply to a comment by R Newton

dc.contributor.authorYagle, Andrew E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-19T19:13:44Z
dc.date.available2006-12-19T19:13:44Z
dc.date.issued1989-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationYagle, A E (1989). "COMMENT: Reply to a comment by R Newton." Inverse Problems. 5(3): 439-440. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49092>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0266-5611en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49092
dc.description.abstractFollowing Newton's comment (see ibid., vol.5, p.437 (1989)), the author points out that: (1) the major contribution of his previous paper (see ibid., vol.4, p.549 (1988)) is the generalised fast Cholesky algorithm, not the integral equations; (2) the Marchenko integral equation is correct as written, but does not determine the scattered field; and (3) it is implicitly assumed that the regular solution exists. The last two points suggest that the generalised fast Cholesky algorithm may be the only viable solution to the non-local problem.en_US
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.extent149741 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltden_US
dc.titleCOMMENT: Reply to a comment by R Newtonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDept. of Electr. Eng. & Comput. Sci., Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/49092/2/ipv5i3p439.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/5/3/015en_US
dc.identifier.sourceInverse Problems.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record