Show simple item record

Revisiting reliability of quantified perineal ultrasound: Bland and Altman analysis of a new protocol for the rectangular coordinate method

dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, S. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Josef M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBenson, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJain, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPanagopoulos, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeLancey, John O. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSampselle, Carolyn M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-17T15:55:53Z
dc.date.available2007-01-17T15:55:53Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.citationArmstrong, S.M.; Miller, J.M.; Benson, K.; Jain, S.; Panagopoulos, K.; DeLancey, J.O.L.; Sampselle, C.M. (2006)."Revisiting reliability of quantified perineal ultrasound: Bland and Altman analysis of a new protocol for the rectangular coordinate method." Neurourology and Urodynamics 25(7): 731-738. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49312>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49312
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16897749&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractAims This study tested the reliability of a new protocol for the rectangular coordinate method of quantifying perineal ultrasound. Methods Representative scans of healthy primiparous females were quantified by positioning a pubic bone template, drawn onto an acetate sheet containing x–y axes, over scans, by aligning the x-axis with the pubic bone central axis. Values for x (D x ) and y (D y ) located the urethrovesical junction (UVJ) at Rest, and at maximal Valsalva and Kegel. Range of motion (V–K) was calculated. Bland and Altman analysis, correlations, and t -tests determined intra- and inter-rater reliability, and variance due to designation of the pubic bone central axis (template control). Results Correlations averaged 0.72, 0.70, and 0.92 for intra-rater, inter-rater, and template control experiments. D x Rest, D x Kegel, and V–K were reliable in all experiments. First and second measures for inter-rater D y Rest and D y Kegel, and template control D y Valsalva were significantly different. Bland and Altman analysis showed D y Rest, D y Kegel, and D x and D y Valsalva for both reliability experiments to have limits of agreement (LOA's) large enough to explain ≥50% of the actual value ranges. Template control LOA's explained ≤30% of the actual value ranges. Conclusions The reliability of this protocol varied according to the conditions analyzed; accurate reliability assessment of all conditions required Bland and Altman analysis; and the designation of the pubic bone central axis remained a source of variance between investigators. Our results suggest Bland and Altman analysis be used with each study that quantifies perineal ultrasound. Neurourol. Urodynam. 25:731–738, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent379917 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMiscellaneous Medicalen_US
dc.titleRevisiting reliability of quantified perineal ultrasound: Bland and Altman analysis of a new protocol for the rectangular coordinate methoden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Research Assistant Professor, 400 N. Ingalls, Room 3247, University of Michigan School of Nursing/Division II, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0482.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16897749en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/49312/1/20299_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.20299en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.