Effects of color on the detection of retroreflective pedestrian markings by normal and color deficient drivers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sayer, J. R. en
dc.contributor Mefford, M. L en
dc.contributor Flannagan, M. J. en
dc.contributor Sivak, M. en
dc.contributor Reflectance/ Absorptivity/ Reflectivity en
dc.date.accessioned 2007-02-13T15:38:59Z
dc.date.available 2007-02-13T15:38:59Z
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.identifier 92114 en
dc.identifier.other UMTRI-99-6 en
dc.identifier.other PB99-155228 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49397
dc.description.abstract A nighttime field study was conducted to assess the effects of color on the detection of retroreflective pedestrian markings by color normal and color deficient drivers. Participants seated in a stationary vehicle, with its low-beam headlamps on, indicated when a moving pedestrian, who wore colored retroreflective markings on her legs, was just detectable. Independent variables included color (red, yellow, green, and white), retroreflective power, participant age, color-vision capability, and location of the stimulus in the visual field (centrally or peripherally located). This experiment demonstrated that, for persons with normal color vision, the color of a retroreflective marking affects the distance at which a pedestrian, located in the central portion of the visual field, can be detected. This result is consistent with previous research for color normal individuals (Sayer et al., 1998). Specifically, colored retroreflective stimuli were detected at distances 3 to 6% greater than a photometrically matched achromatic stimulus. Furthermore, the findings are qualitatively in agreement with the Helmholtz-Kohlrausch effect. Color deficiency had a measurable, although limited, influence on the effect of color on detection distance. The results with regard to central versus peripheral locations were not conclusive. This study, as well as a related previous study (Sayer et al., 1998) indicated that, under the conditions of this experiment, color influences detection distance to a lesser extent than suggested by the color correction factors prescribed in ASTM E 1501. Tentatively, the discrepancy seems to be accounted for by the size of the retroreflective markings, in terms of visual angle, at the point at which drivers first detect or recognize them. The ASTM correction factors may be appropriate for larger visual angles, but smaller correction factors may be more appropriate if retroreflective markings can be expected to have very small visual angles (approaching point sources) at critical distances. However, the influence of color and its interaction with visual angle has not been fully characterized by this study or by the previous studies of retroreflective stimuli, and further research on the effects of color, SIA, and size is needed. en
dc.description.sponsorship Michigan University, Ann Arbor, Industry Affiliation Program for Human Factors in Transportation Safety en
dc.format 22 ref. figs. tables en
dc.format.extent 36 en
dc.format.extent 204586 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language English en
dc.publisher University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute en
dc.subject.other Pedestrians en
dc.subject.other Nighttime en
dc.subject.other Color/ Chromaticity en
dc.subject.other Colorblindness en
dc.subject.other Color Sense en
dc.subject.other Visibility en
dc.subject.other Field Experiments en
dc.title Effects of color on the detection of retroreflective pedestrian markings by normal and color deficient drivers en
dc.type Technical Report en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel Transportation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel Engineering
dc.description.bitstreamurl http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/49397/1/UMTRI-99-6.pdf en_US
dc.owningcollname Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI)
 Show simple item record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search Deep Blue

Advanced Search

Browse by

My Account


Available Now

MLibrary logo