Show simple item record

Separation System for Tethered Satellites

dc.contributor.authorCarnaghi, Matthewen_US
dc.contributor.authorEller, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorKheng, Eugeneen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarks, Emilyen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMorrow, Rossen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-03T16:02:52Z
dc.date.available2007-04-03T16:02:52Z
dc.date.issued2006-04en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49578
dc.descriptionCapstone Design and Manufacturing Experience: Winter 2006en_US
dc.description.abstractThe success of the TSATT mission is dependent on a successful tether deployment: a flawless separation without tangling due to interference with the separation system. Separation system benchmarks have been researched to help guide our design and establish a foundation for the separation concept. The ideal heritage-flown separation system called the Lightband is not feasible to separate our two payloads due to the cost exceeding $110,000 and possible tether snag issues. The goal for our ME 450 team is to prove that our laboratory can design, fabricate, and test a separation system that can be integrated for separating the two payloads during the TSATT mission.en_US
dc.format.extent1929 bytes
dc.format.extent1373213 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectTSATTen_US
dc.subjectSeperationen_US
dc.subjectTetheren_US
dc.subjectSatelliteen_US
dc.subjectLightbanden_US
dc.titleSeparation System for Tethered Satellitesen_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumME 450 Studentsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/49578/2/proj21_report.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameMechanical Engineering, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.