Show simple item record

Ultrastructural and morphometric analysis of the separation of two thigh muscles in the chick

dc.contributor.authorSchroeter, Sallyen_US
dc.contributor.authorTosney, Kathryn W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-06T17:46:11Z
dc.date.available2007-04-06T17:46:11Z
dc.date.issued1991-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchroeter, Sally; Tosney, Kathryn W. (1991)."Ultrastructural and morphometric analysis of the separation of two thigh muscles in the chick." American Journal of Anatomy 191(4): 351-368. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49699>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9106en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-0795en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49699
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1951135&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractLimb muscles separate from one another in a complex but highly stereotyped sequence and spatial pattern. The process of separation is characterized by the progression of a region of increased extracellular space, the cleavage zone , along the proximodistal axis between the individual muscle anlagen. We analyzed ultrastructurally the muscles and cleavage zone during the separation of two representative muscles, the developing sartorius and iliotibialis in the chick thigh, to establish an accurate baseline for an analysis of the mechanisms of separation. Comparisons of the morphology and distribution of cells before and after separation show no evidence that muscles became separated by the massive influx of an exterior cell population; if populations invade the cleavage zone, they are small. We do find characteristic transitions within the cell population of the cleavage zone in situ that could accomplish cleavage without invoking massive cell movements. These progressive transitions within the cleavage zone include a loss of close cell-cell interactions, an increase in extracellular space, the assumption of a more stellate morphology by mesenchyme cells, and a gradual alteration in the composition of the extracellular matrix from one typical of early muscle to one typical of loose connective tissue. Myotubes do differentiate between the incipient muscles, ruling out the possibility that the location where muscles will separate is defined by sites where myotubes fail to differentiate. Instead, the myotubes in the cleavage zone gradually diminish in number and appear to be specifically recognized and removed from the cleavage zone by phagocytes. We suggest that the transitions within the cleavage zone, including the loss of muscle cells, are a result of the progressive differentiation of loose connective tissue. If so, then the spatial pattern and process of cleavage is a consequence of spatially programmed cell differentiation.en_US
dc.format.extent3412609 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCell & Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.titleUltrastructural and morphometric analysis of the separation of two thigh muscles in the chicken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048en_US
dc.identifier.pmid1951135en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/49699/1/1001910403_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001910403en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Anatomyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.