Show simple item record

Development of the retinofugal projections in the embryonic and larval zebrafish ( Brachydanio rerio )

dc.contributor.authorBurrill, John D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEaster, Stephen S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-06T18:23:27Z
dc.date.available2007-04-06T18:23:27Z
dc.date.issued1994-08-22en_US
dc.identifier.citationBurrill, John D.; Easter, Stephen S. (1994)."Development of the retinofugal projections in the embryonic and larval zebrafish ( Brachydanio rerio )." The Journal of Comparative Neurology 346(4): 583-600. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50063>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9967en_US
dc.identifier.issn1096-9861en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50063
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7983245&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractStudies of the projection from the vertebrate retina have contributed significantly to current concepts of neural development. The zebrafish has recently become a favored system for the study of development in general and neural development in particular. Although the development of both the optic nerve and the retinotectal projection of the zebrafish has been described, the retinofugal projection in its entirety has not. This paper describes it and also addresses the issue of projectional exuberance: i. e., transient projections to targets that are not innervated in the adult. The retinofugal projection of embryonic and larval zebrafish (32 hours to 7 days post-fertilization) was labeled by intraocular injection of DiI (1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′, tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate) and then studied in wholemounts and sections. The first optic axons crossed the chiasm at 32 hours post-fertilization and projected in a straight line to reach the tectum at about 44 hours. At 48 hours, a few optic axons deviated along either the tract of the posterior commissure or the tract of the postoptic commissure. By 72 hours (about the time of hatching) optic axons arborized in ten distinct regions, termed arborization fields. At 6–7 days post-fertilization, the same ten arborization fields (nine contralateral, one bilater) were evident. Most of the arborization fields were located in the superficial neuropil and were not associated with morphologically identifiable clusters of somata. On the basis of various landmarks, the ten arborization fields are identified as precursors of retinorecipient nuclei previously described in other adult cypriniform fishes. The development was characterized by the nearly complete absence of any transient projections. Thus, the idea that axonal outgrowth is initially exuberant and trimmed back later is not supported by these results. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent2307952 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherNeuroscience, Neurology and Psychiatryen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of the retinofugal projections in the embryonic and larval zebrafish ( Brachydanio rerio )en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumNeuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 ; Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumNeuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 ; Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048en_US
dc.identifier.pmid7983245en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/50063/1/903460410_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.903460410en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Comparative Neurologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.