Show simple item record

Evaluating and Selecting Digital Payment Mechanisms

dc.contributor.authorMacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K.
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Kimberly
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-16T02:50:26Z
dc.date.available2007-04-16T02:50:26Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationin Interconnection and the Internet, G. Rosston and D. Waterman, eds. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997: 113-134. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50457>en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50457
dc.description.abstractThe Internet is growing rapidly as a marketplace for the exchange of both tangible and information goods and services. Numerous payment mechanisms suitable for use in this marketplace are in various stages of development. Because their development is so recent, it is difficult for potential participants in electronic commerce to evaluate and select payment mechanisms. We propose a systematic method for evaluating and selecting payment mechanisms. Our selection process typically leads to a solution in a few iterations or less; it is generalizable; and it requires relatively little information about each alternative, reducing the cost of evaluating and selecting payment mechanisms. Researchers and payment mechanism designers are guided on further development by the needs of users who desire particular bundles of characteristics. As a by-product of our analysis, we present a detailed matrix characterizing 10 leading payment systems according to 30 criteria.en
dc.format.extent111415 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.titleEvaluating and Selecting Digital Payment Mechanismsen
dc.typeBook Chapteren_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumInformation, School ofen
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/50457/1/digidoll.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameInformation, School of (SI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.