How Important Are Wages to the Elderly? Evidence from the New Beneficiary Data System and the Social Security Earnings Test
dc.contributor.author | Haider, Steven J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Loughran, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-04-25T18:49:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-04-25T18:49:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50570 | |
dc.description.abstract | More than 40 percent of Social Security beneficiaries continue to work after age 65. This research investigates the extent to which these individuals substitute labor across periods in response to anticipated wage changes induced by the Social Security earnings test. While we find that a disproportionate number of individuals choose earnings within a few percentage points of the earnings limit, we find no evidence that these individuals substitute labor supply between ages 69 and 70 when, in our sample, the tax on earnings falls from 50 percent to zero. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | Social Security Administration | en |
dc.format.extent | 484397 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | Michigan Retirement Research Center, University of Michigan, P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP 2003-049 | en |
dc.title | How Important Are Wages to the Elderly? Evidence from the New Beneficiary Data System and the Social Security Earnings Test | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Population and Demography | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Michigan State University | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | RAND | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/50570/1/wp049.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Retirement and Disability Research Center, Michigan (MRDRC) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.