Show simple item record

An evaluation of the replicate pool method: quick estimation of genome-wide linkage peak p -values

dc.contributor.authorWigginton, Janis E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbecasis, Gonçalo R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-02T14:16:57Z
dc.date.available2007-05-02T14:16:57Z
dc.date.issued2006-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationWigginton, Janis E.; Abecasis, GonÇalo R. (2006). "An evaluation of the replicate pool method: quick estimation of genome-wide linkage peak p -values." Genetic Epidemiology 30(4): 320-332. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50657>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0741-0395en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2272en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/50657
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16832873&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe calculation of empirical p -values for genome-wide non-parametric linkage tests continues to present significant computational challenges for many complex disease mapping studies. The gold standard approach is to use gene dropping to simulate null genome scans. Unfortunately, this approach is too computationally expensive for many data sets of interest. An alternative, more efficient method for sampling null genome scans is to pre-calculate pools of family-specific statistics and then resample from these replicate pools to generate “pseudo-replicate” genome scans. In this study, we use simulations to explore properties of the replicate pool p -value estimator [pcirc] RP and show that it provides an excellent approximation to the traditional gene-dropping estimator for significantly less computational effort. While the computational efficiency of the replicate pool estimator is noticeable in almost all data sets, by applying the replicate pool method to several previously characterized data sets we show that savings in computational effort can be especially significant (on the order of 10,000-fold or more) when one or more large families are analyzed. We also estimate replicate pool p -values for the schizophrenia data described by Abecasis et al. and show that [pcirc] RP closely approximates gene-drop p -values for all linkage peaks reported for this study. Lastly, we expand upon Song et al.'s previous work by deriving a conservative estimator of the variance for [pcirc] RP that can easily be computed in practical settings.We have implemented the replicate pool method along with our variance estimator in a new program called Pseudo, which is the first widely available automated implementation of the replicate pool method. Genet . Epidemiol . 30, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent301998 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherGeneticsen_US
dc.titleAn evaluation of the replicate pool method: quick estimation of genome-wide linkage peak p -valuesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeneticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMolecular, Cellular and Developmental Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Statistical Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI ; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Statistical Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16832873en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/50657/1/20147_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20147en_US
dc.identifier.sourceGenetic Epidemiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.