Show simple item record

Succession: a comparative study in the revegetation of three abandoned building sites.

dc.contributor.authorHruska, Allanen_US
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Campusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T18:59:31Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T18:59:31Z
dc.date.issued1978en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/53147
dc.description.abstractClassically succession is thought of as the orderly, gradual change in vegetation types (Clements 1916) eventually leading to a climax community which will be stable to perturbation. These patterns of change have been noted in an old field situation and in an abandoned building site. This study was conducted to update the regetation-succession study started by F.C. Gates in 1930, to note the pattern in changing vegetation over times as well as to compare the changes in the three sites which were first studied by Gates, and which have now all been resurveyed.en_US
dc.format.extent3129079 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartDiagram or Illustrationen_US
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartMapen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectBoreal Floraen_US
dc.subject.otherREVEGETATIONen_US
dc.subject.otherSUCCESSIONen_US
dc.subject.otherABANDONEDen_US
dc.subject.otherTERRESTRIALen_US
dc.subject.otherFORESTen_US
dc.subject.otherVEGETATIONen_US
dc.subject.otherVASCULARen_US
dc.subject.otherPLANTSen_US
dc.titleSuccession: a comparative study in the revegetation of three abandoned building sites.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/53147/1/1581.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.