Show simple item record

Optimal foraging of beaver (Castor canadensis) in northern lower Michigan.

dc.contributor.authorHoeksema, Jasonen_US
dc.coverage.spatialMaple River - East Branchen_US
dc.coverage.spatialHook Point - Douglas Lakeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T22:20:59Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T22:20:59Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54533
dc.description.abstractAn energy-maximizing central place model of optimal foraging predicts that animals will maximize their food energy intake per unit foraging time. We studied the beaver (Castor canadensis) in northern lower Michigan to test predictions of this model. Specifically, we tested whether beaver prefer to feed on certain tree species, whether they prefer to feed near or far from shore, whether there is a relationship between diameter and distance from shore of trees cut by beaver, and whether beaver are more selective by size at increasing distances from shore. We set up transects perpendicular to the bodies of water near two active beaver lodges, one on a lake and one on a river. We determined genus, diameter, distance from shore line and status of each tree in the transects. At the river site aspen (Populus spp.) was the preferred tree genus, while at the lake site, alder (Alnus spp.) was preferred; these genera are known to be nutritionally superior to some of the other genera available to beaver. At both sites, beaver utilized a significantly greater number and proportion of trees near to shore than far from shore, presumably minimizing energy expenditure per unit of food energy gained. Although we found no significant relationship between diameter of trees cut by beaver and distance to shoreline for any genera, beaver were more selective in terms of size of trees cut at greater distances from shore, which is consistent with a model of size-distance relationships in optimal foraging. Future investigations of beaver foraging in relation to optimal foraging theory should consider factors such as tree chemical defense and how beaver treat very large trees when attempting to quantify relationships between size and distance from the shoreline of beaver forage.en_US
dc.format.extent493600 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherCASTORen_US
dc.subject.otherBEAVERen_US
dc.subject.otherVERTEBRATESen_US
dc.subject.otherFORAGINGen_US
dc.subject.otherBEHAVIORen_US
dc.subject.otherFOODen_US
dc.subject.otherSELECTIONen_US
dc.subject.otherHERBIVORYen_US
dc.subject.otherMAMMALSen_US
dc.titleOptimal foraging of beaver (Castor canadensis) in northern lower Michigan.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54533/1/2972.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 2972.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.