A study of preferential prey selection in Castor canadensis.
dc.contributor.author | Duquaine, Damon | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | UMBS Station | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Grapevine Trail | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Wilderness State Park | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-06-14T22:47:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-06-14T22:47:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54723 | |
dc.description.abstract | The focus of this study was to investigate feeding preference of Castor canadensis with respect to species, number of trees foraged relative to the distance from shore, and the girth of foraged trees relative to their distance from shore. Wilderness State Park in Emmett County, Michigan, a coniferous dominated forest, and Grapevine point, a deciduous dominated forest on the property of the university of Michigan Biological Station in Cheboygan County, Michigan, were chosen due to their support of beaver activity. After dividing up transect of 68.2m by 20m at Wilderness State Park and 30m by 20m transect at Grapevine Point, it was found that there was a significant difference in proportions of foraged trees at Wilderness State Park (X2=169.7, X2=14.1, p<0.05, df=7). Further analysis showed significant difference in the proportions of foraged trees at Grapevine Point (X2=18.61, X2=15.5, p<0.05, df=8). When examined, the difference in the proportion of trees consumed ""near"" versus ""far"" relative to shore, at Wilderness State Park indicate no significance in the proportion of trees foraged in each either section (X2=1.57, X2=3.84, p>0.05, df=1). Conversely, significant preference for trees ""near"" the shore was shown at Grapevine point (X2=20.59, X2=3.84, p<0.05, df=1) Finally, in examining the mean girth of ""near"" versus ""far"" trees at Wilderness State Park, the mean girth of the ""near"" trees was 16.0 +15.0 and the mean girth of the ""far"" trees was 30.0 + 11.0. These data proved to be parametric, (skewness=0.090, kurtosis -0.954) analysis, showed a significantly larger mean in the ""far"" trees than in the ""near"" trees (T=4.604, df=75.9, p<0.0001). Conversely, a non-parametric equivalent showed no significant difference in the mean girths of ""near"" and ""far"" trees at Grapevine Point (skewness=4.026, kurtosis=23.705, Mann-Whitney U=377.500, p=0.654, X2=0.201, df=1). What can be shown is that beaver do prefer aspen trees when available and maple trees when aspen is not available. However, due to the difference in composition of the canopies of both sites, very little information can be extrapolated to discuss overall feeding preference in beavers. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 286682 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3144 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.relation.haspart | Graph | en_US |
dc.subject | General Ecology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | MAMMALS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | VERTEBRATES | en_US |
dc.subject.other | CASTOR | en_US |
dc.subject.other | BEAVER | en_US |
dc.subject.other | FORAGING | en_US |
dc.subject.other | BEHAVIOR | en_US |
dc.subject.other | FEEDING | en_US |
dc.subject.other | PREFERENCE | en_US |
dc.subject.other | TREE | en_US |
dc.subject.other | POPULUS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | ACER | en_US |
dc.subject.other | CHI-SQUARE | en_US |
dc.subject.other | T-TEST | en_US |
dc.title | A study of preferential prey selection in Castor canadensis. | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resource and Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Biological Station, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54723/1/3164.pdf | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 3164.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Biological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.