Woody plant foraging preferences of the beaver (Castor canadensis).
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Justin | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Canada Goose Pond | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | UMBS Station | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Grapevine Trail | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Wilderness State Park | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-06-14T22:51:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-06-14T22:51:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54748 | |
dc.description.abstract | Beaver can have a tremendous impact on their surroundings, altering the entire physical and chemical regime of the landscapes they inhabit. In this study we examined the effects tree size, tree distance from the waterway, and tree species have on beaver foraging habits. Because of past studies modeling optimum foraging patterns in central-place foragers (i.e. beaver), we chose null hypotheses that 1)beaver would show no preference in their tree species choice, that 2) beaver would harvest an equal number of trees both near to and far from the waterway, and that 3) the size of the trees harvested would be independent of their distance from the waterway. Transects were set up at Grapevine Point and Wilderness State Park near active beaver colonies. After data collection, analysis with a Chi square showed beaver to prefer sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and red oak (Quercus rubra) at Grapevine Point and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) and black ash (Fraxinus nigra) at Wilderness Park. Analysis with Mann-Whitney U tests showed that Grapevine point beaver harvested more trees closer to shore, but harvested equally large trees regardless of distance from shore. Wilderness park beaver harvested an equal number of trees near to and far from shore, but harvested larger trees farther from shore. These results seem to contradict an optimal foraging pattern, but may be due to biotic and abiotic factors such as beaver energetic constraints, predation risks, plant secondary chemical production, differential use of plant tissues, landscape topography and the thermal regime. Knowledge of these factors as they apply to an optimal foraging pattern can lead to the improved maintenance of our beaver populations and our waterways. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 343971 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3144 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.relation.haspart | Table of Numbers | en_US |
dc.subject | General Ecology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | VERTEBRATES | en_US |
dc.subject.other | MAMMALS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | CASTOR | en_US |
dc.subject.other | BEAVER | en_US |
dc.subject.other | FORAGING | en_US |
dc.subject.other | BEHAVIOR | en_US |
dc.subject.other | TREE | en_US |
dc.subject.other | SIZE | en_US |
dc.subject.other | SPECIES | en_US |
dc.subject.other | FOREST | en_US |
dc.subject.other | COMPOSITION | en_US |
dc.subject.other | ACER | en_US |
dc.subject.other | QUERCUS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | POPULUS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | FRAXINUS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | CHI-SQUARE | en_US |
dc.subject.other | PREFERENCE | en_US |
dc.title | Woody plant foraging preferences of the beaver (Castor canadensis). | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resource and Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Biological Station, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54748/1/3189.pdf | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 3189.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Biological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.