Show simple item record

A comparison of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus feeding preferences utilizing green and senescent leaves of four species of riparian vegetation.

dc.contributor.authorCohen, Alan B.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialCarp Creeken_US
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Campusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T22:54:04Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T22:54:04Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54770
dc.description.abstractRelatively few studies have been done on herbivory in bryophytes and aquatic macrophytes. One example of chemical deterrence of herbivory in an aquatic macrophyte is in Nasturtium officinale (watercress). Previous studies have indicated that the amphipod Gammarus pseudolimnaeus avoids green N. officinale tissue. To determine whether G. pseudolimnaeus is primarily a detritivore or is deterred specifically by secondary compounds in N. officinale, feeding preferences of G. pseudolimnaeus for green versus senescent leaf tissue were studied in fifteen replicates of four species of associated riparian vegetation, Alnus rugosa (speckled alder), Caltha palustris (marsh marigold,), Lemna minor (duckweed), and Fontinalis hypnoides ( a moss). Relative consumption of angiosperm and bryophyte tissue was also of interest. Samples were collected from Carp Creek, Michigan. Green and senescent leaf tissue from one species of plant was placed in each petri dish with G. pseudolimnaeus. All data was analyzed using chi-squared tests. In all species, senescent tissue was consumed significantly more than green tissue (p<0.05). Almost no green angiosperm tissue was consumed, and the frequency of green bryophyte tissue consumption was significantly higher than for green angiosperm tissue (p<0.05).These results suggest that G. pseudolimnaeus prefers decomposing plant tissue, apparently feeding primarily as a detritivore. Possible reasons for avoidance of green angiosperm tissue include chemical deterrence and/or failure of invertebrates to recognize green leaves as food. The function of bryophyte secondary compounds in deterring herbivory may differ markedly from angiosperm secondary compounds.en_US
dc.format.extent764760 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherBEHAVIORen_US
dc.subject.otherPREFERENCESen_US
dc.subject.otherHERBIVORYen_US
dc.subject.otherAQUATICen_US
dc.subject.otherMACROPHYTESen_US
dc.subject.otherLEAVESen_US
dc.titleA comparison of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus feeding preferences utilizing green and senescent leaves of four species of riparian vegetation.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54770/1/3211.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3211.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.