Show simple item record

Andrus Lake Comparative Lake Survey.

dc.contributor.authorDammann, Nancy M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDurocher, Ryanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Melissaen_US
dc.coverage.spatialAndrus Lake - Chippewa Co.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T22:54:54Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T22:54:54Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54776
dc.description.abstractAcidification of lake ecosystems has become an increasing problem in recent decades. As this trend continues, it is important to come to a better understanding of both the causes and effects of lake acidification. This study, a survey of Andrus Lake which is located in the Lake Superior State Forest in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, aimed to further the understanding of the complex relationships between trophic structure and physical parameters; to understand why Andrus Lake is an acidic, dystrophic, oligotrophic lake; and provide a valuable baseline of data from which further changes can be detected and analyzed. Andrus Lake exhibits a complex relationship between its morphology as a seepage lake, conifer dominated watershed, dystrophic and acidic qualities, and low primary productivity. The high hydraulic retention time makes the lake particularly sensitive to acidification, while the conifer dominated watershed decreases the ANC of the water and further increases the acidity of the surface run-off. The high tannin inputs lead to the dystrophic nature of the lake and decrease light penetration and thus productivity. The biological community within the lake reflects these characteristics. While the zooplankton and fish populations show some indications of adaption to acidity, both the phytoplankton and macrophytic communities are dominated by species well adapted to acidic conditions. Species of Spirogyra many of which are well adapted to acidic environments, made up 27% of the algal community, while three of the macrophytes are acidiphiles. Overall diversity within all the groups was decreased and productivity was low.en_US
dc.format.extent1198810 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartMapen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectLimnologyen_US
dc.subject.otherLAKEen_US
dc.subject.otherSURVEYen_US
dc.subject.otherCOMPARATIVEen_US
dc.subject.otherACIDIFICATIONen_US
dc.subject.otherMORPHOMETRYen_US
dc.subject.otherWATERen_US
dc.subject.otherCHEMISTRYen_US
dc.subject.otherNUTRIENTSen_US
dc.subject.otherSEEPAGEen_US
dc.subject.otherKETTLEen_US
dc.subject.otherDYSTROPHICen_US
dc.subject.otherALKALINITYen_US
dc.titleAndrus Lake Comparative Lake Survey.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54776/1/3217.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3217.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.