Relative prey capturing efficiency between two species of sundew: Drosera linearis and Drosera rotundifolia.
dc.contributor.author | Baltensperger, Andy | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Evergreen Beach - Presque Isle | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-06-14T23:07:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-06-14T23:07:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | published in Michigan Botanist, January 2004, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 15 <https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015061359710> | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54866 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015061359710 | |
dc.description.abstract | Members of the genus Drosera (sundews) are notorious for their ability to capture insects in order to supplement low levels of nutrients in the habitats in which they live. Two species, Drosera linearis and Drosera rotundifolia use the same mechanisms to capture prey, but are distinctly different in the shapes of their leaves and their preferred habitats. I aimed to determine whether one species was more efficient at capturing insects than the other, and if so, ascertain the reasons for such a disparity. In a rich fen in the northern lower peninsula of Michigan, I estimated, for both species, populations in relation to the area of exposed soil, calculated percentages of leaves containing insects and counted the numbers of insects captured by these leaves per unit-area. Populations of the two species were found in two different micro-habitats; however the correlation between exposed soil and species abundance was not statistically significant. Drosera linearis individuals had a higher percentage of leaves containing insects and caught an average of four times as many insects as D. rotundifolia per leaf. Drosera linearis was 2.3 times more efficient at capturing insects than D. rotundifolia per mm2. These results are most likely due to differences in the orientation and shape of leaves as well as differing moisture levels, acidity and interspecies competition between micro-habitats. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1226165 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3144 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.relation.haspart | Graph | en_US |
dc.relation.haspart | Map | en_US |
dc.subject | Ecology of Wetlands | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Dune and Swale Complex | en_US |
dc.subject.other | AQUATIC | en_US |
dc.subject.other | VASCULAR | en_US |
dc.subject.other | PLANTS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | CARNIVOROUS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | INSECTS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | CAPTURE | en_US |
dc.subject.other | FEN | en_US |
dc.subject.other | HABITAT | en_US |
dc.subject.other | ANALYSIS | en_US |
dc.title | Relative prey capturing efficiency between two species of sundew: Drosera linearis and Drosera rotundifolia. | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resource and Environment | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Biological Station, University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54866/1/3307.pdf | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 3307.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Biological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.