Show simple item record

Relative prey capturing efficiency between two species of sundew: Drosera linearis and Drosera rotundifolia.

dc.contributor.authorBaltensperger, Andyen_US
dc.coverage.spatialEvergreen Beach - Presque Isleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:07:15Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:07:15Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.citationpublished in Michigan Botanist, January 2004, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 15 <https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015061359710>
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54866
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015061359710
dc.description.abstractMembers of the genus Drosera (sundews) are notorious for their ability to capture insects in order to supplement low levels of nutrients in the habitats in which they live. Two species, Drosera linearis and Drosera rotundifolia use the same mechanisms to capture prey, but are distinctly different in the shapes of their leaves and their preferred habitats. I aimed to determine whether one species was more efficient at capturing insects than the other, and if so, ascertain the reasons for such a disparity. In a rich fen in the northern lower peninsula of Michigan, I estimated, for both species, populations in relation to the area of exposed soil, calculated percentages of leaves containing insects and counted the numbers of insects captured by these leaves per unit-area. Populations of the two species were found in two different micro-habitats; however the correlation between exposed soil and species abundance was not statistically significant. Drosera linearis individuals had a higher percentage of leaves containing insects and caught an average of four times as many insects as D. rotundifolia per leaf. Drosera linearis was 2.3 times more efficient at capturing insects than D. rotundifolia per mm2. These results are most likely due to differences in the orientation and shape of leaves as well as differing moisture levels, acidity and interspecies competition between micro-habitats.en_US
dc.format.extent1226165 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartMapen_US
dc.subjectEcology of Wetlandsen_US
dc.subject.classificationDune and Swale Complexen_US
dc.subject.otherAQUATICen_US
dc.subject.otherVASCULARen_US
dc.subject.otherPLANTSen_US
dc.subject.otherCARNIVOROUSen_US
dc.subject.otherINSECTSen_US
dc.subject.otherCAPTUREen_US
dc.subject.otherFENen_US
dc.subject.otherHABITATen_US
dc.subject.otherANALYSISen_US
dc.titleRelative prey capturing efficiency between two species of sundew: Drosera linearis and Drosera rotundifolia.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54866/1/3307.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3307.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.