Show simple item record

Examining preferences of Castor canadensis for tree diameter, distance, and species: Optimal foraging behavior?

dc.contributor.authorDalal, Neilen_US
dc.coverage.spatialGrapevine Point - Douglas Lakeen_US
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Stationen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:08:37Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:08:37Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54876
dc.description.abstractOptimal foraging is a valuable tool in the study of adaptation. Many generations of selective pressure force organisms to maximize foraging efficiency. The beaver, Castor canadensis, provides an excellent model for the study of foraging behavior. They harvest trees for food, dams, and lodges, with visually obvious results. Since the profitability of foraging behavior for beavers is a function of tree size, distance of the tree from shore, and tree species, these variables were examined. Following optimal foraging theory, we believe the beaver should prefer small trees to large, trees closer to the shoreline than far, and demonstrate species preference. Our study was conducted at Grapevine Point in Cheboygan County, northern lower Michigan, USA. Each tree in four plots approximately 20 m wide and 20m in depth was examined, and we recorded the tree diameter, perpendicular distance of each tree from the shore, tree species, and treatment of each tree by beaver. Trees were categorized as being either only foraged, foraged and felled, foraged and removed, or unforaged. Chi square analysis showed a significant preference by beaver for the small and large trees (X2 calc = 55.47, df = 2, P < 0.05), and avoidance of the middle size trees. However, no difference in preference was found for trees based on distance (X2 calc = 3.81, df = 2, P < 0.05). Species preference was found for the bigtooth aspen and American beech. In addition, removed trees were found to be statistically significantly smaller in diameter than unremoved trees (U=276.5, P < 0.001). Results differing from the expected hypotheses may be due to the downhill terrain towards the shore or a lack of predators, reducing the preference for nearby trees. Preference for aspen trees agrees with its characteristics of high nutritive value and easy digestibility. In addition, beaver have been shown to prefer aspen when it is especially abundant. However, studies of optimal foraging in beavers have been conducted in a variety of ecosystems, and the results differ widely; the species and abundance of trees present in an area seems to play a large role. Nonetheless, beaver in our study did exhibit behaviors that would be favored by natural selection.en_US
dc.format.extent505374 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subject.classificationAspenen_US
dc.subject.otherMAMMALSen_US
dc.subject.otherFORAGINGen_US
dc.subject.otherBEHAVIORen_US
dc.subject.otherPOPULUSen_US
dc.subject.otherFAGUSen_US
dc.subject.otherVASCULARen_US
dc.subject.otherPLANTSen_US
dc.titleExamining preferences of Castor canadensis for tree diameter, distance, and species: Optimal foraging behavior?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54876/1/3317.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3317.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Accessibility: If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.