Show simple item record

Spider prey selection and avoidance of toxins.

dc.contributor.authorFox, Adamen_US
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Campusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:15:14Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:15:14Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54924
dc.description.abstractAnimals practice a wide variety of foraging techniques, all designed to obtain the most energy out of foraging in the least amount of time. Spiders are sit and wait predators that construct webs that facilitate prey capture. Spiders practice active prey selection to find an optimal compromise between energy-rich prey and prey with poor nutritional value or toxicity. I set out to determine if spiders have a mechanism to avoid toxic insects by placing toxic (milkweed bugs, willow flea weevils, stink bugs) and non-toxic (flies) insects into spiders webs and observing whether they were consumed. I predicted that spiders would feed on toxic insects less frequently than non-toxic insects to avoid the negative nutritional value of the toxins. I also proposed that there would be different consumption rates at differenct web heights and web diameters. Using a X2 test I found no difference among insect species as to which were consumed or not consumed (X2=1.994, df=3, P=0.574). There was a slight trend that flies were preferred since 40% of flies were consumed. I performed an analysis of variance, which showed an interaction between prety type and web type (F=2.183, P=0.067). This interaction indicates that certain prey are preferred or avoided in certain web types. There was no significant relationship between web height or web diameter and the consumption of any species (Height: F=1.43, P=0.259 - Diameter F=1.538, df=47, P=0.239). My data does not support my original hypothesis that spiders would feed on toxic insects less frequently than non-toxic insects. This was most likely due to the lack of repeated feeding of toxic insects to individual spiders allowing them to develop a tolerance or an acquired aversion towards the toxic prey.en_US
dc.format.extent321317 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectBehavioral Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherINSECTSen_US
dc.subject.otherSPIDERSen_US
dc.subject.otherPREDATIONen_US
dc.subject.otherBEHAVIORen_US
dc.subject.otherFORAGINGen_US
dc.subject.otherOPTIMALen_US
dc.subject.otherSELECTIONen_US
dc.subject.otherPREYen_US
dc.titleSpider prey selection and avoidance of toxins.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54924/1/3365.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3365.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.