Show simple item record

Spider predation as a selective pressure on midge body size.

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Kimen_US
dc.contributor.authorJung, Wendyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKatzmann, Kellyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKiley, Oliveren_US
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Campusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:21:12Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:21:12Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/54967
dc.description.abstractThe adaptationist paradigm suggests that organisms today are primarily a result of natural selection. However, fixed and neutral traits, as well as genetic drift, often undermine the assumed pervasiveness of natural selection. For many species, body size is polymorphic and non-neutral, permitting natural selection to favor certain body sizes. Two midge (Diptera: Chironomidae) species, A and B, from UMBS were studied to determine if spider predation exerted non-random mortality on midges with respect to thorax length and width. And if so, whether webs with different cell size exerted different selective pressures. We predicted that intermediate thorax sizes would be selected against (disruptive selection). However, for Species A thorax length and width were significantly smaller for midges caught in webs than for uncaught midges. Thorax length and width for Species B were also significantly smaller for caught midges (length: p<0.001; width: p=0.003). These results suggest that directional selection, not disruptive selection, is favoring longer and wider midges. A potential explanation is that larger midges are better able to avoid or escape from webs. For Species A, small and medium celled webs all appear to exert directional selection for greater length (p<0.001) and width (p<0.007), while larger webs exerted no selective preference on width (p=0.153). Similarly, for Species B, medium and large-celled webs appear to exert directional selection for greater length (p<0.007) and width (p<0.033). However, smaller-celled webs do not appear to exert a selective pressure on length (p=0.263) or width (p=0.831). Smaller webs may negate the size advantages of larger midges, effectively capturing a random sample of the midge population and exerting no overall selective pressure.en_US
dc.format.extent764762 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartDiagram or Illustrationen_US
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherINVERTEBRATESen_US
dc.subject.otherPREDATIONen_US
dc.subject.otherDIPTERAen_US
dc.subject.otherINSECTSen_US
dc.subject.otherCHIRONOMIDAEen_US
dc.subject.otherSPIDERSen_US
dc.subject.otherMIDGESen_US
dc.titleSpider predation as a selective pressure on midge body size.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/54967/1/3408.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3408.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.