Show simple item record

Bee pollination of Lathyrus odoratus (Fabaceae): Preferences based on patch density, average flower size, and flower color.

dc.contributor.authorBelke, Colleenen_US
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Campusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:26:09Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:26:09Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55003
dc.description.abstractLathyrus odoratus (Fabaceae) are bee pollinated plants and must have characteristics with which to attract bees to their flowers. The purpose of this study was to see if certain plot level floral characteristics will attract more bees than others. We hypothesized that bees would be attracted to denser patches of flowering stems because of optimal foraging theory; bees can move between stems quickly and gather food at a higher rate because they do not waste energy traveling between patches. We also hypothesized that bees would be more attracted to plots with larger average banner heights and corolla lengths. Larger banner heights on flowers would be easier for bees to find, and longer corolla length may confer larger amount of pollen produced. A third hypothesis is that bees would prefer plots with lower proportions of pink flowers. We predict this because pink flowers would contrast less with the green foliage background than mixed or white flowers and be easier to locate. Finally, we hypothesize that bees will visit ultraviolet treated stems more than non-ultraviolet treated stems. We predict that they will see treated stems easier and therefore visit them more often. We observed 10 2m x 2m plots of sweet pea plants for one hour each in various pea plant patches. We measured average banner height, corolla length, number of stems, and color of stems in each plot. For the ultraviolet treatment we observed 7 1m x 1m plots within the same patch for 3.5 total observation hours. Half of the stems in each plot were ultraviolet paint treated. For both studies we recorded number of bee visits and lengths of bee visits. Total time of bee visitation did increase with increasing stem density of patches (R2 = 0.504, F ratio = 8.114, df = 8, p<0.05). Total time of bee visitation did not increase with larger banner heights or longer corolla lengths (R2 = 0.002, F ratio = 0.015, df = 8, p>0.05, R2 = 0.091, F ratio = 0.805, df = 8, p>0.05). Total time of bee visitation did not increase with decreasing proportions of pink flowers (R2=0.107, F ratio = 0.961, df = 8, p>0.05). Increasing ultraviolet reflectance did not increase mean bee stay length on stems (t = 1.871, df = 3, p>0.05). We measured average plot heights and average plot light levels and found no affect on amount of bee visitation. Pollinator visitation rates are important because pollination of plants is an essential process maintaining species diversity and production of agricultural crops.en_US
dc.format.extent516912 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.titleBee pollination of Lathyrus odoratus (Fabaceae): Preferences based on patch density, average flower size, and flower color.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55003/1/3444.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3444.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.