Show simple item record

The effect of water retention structures on the distribution and diversity of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates in three northern Michigan streams.

dc.contributor.authorDykema, Jane B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Chester M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLeadley, Carolyn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZeid, Lauren H.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialMaple Riveren_US
dc.coverage.spatialCarp River - Emmet Co.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialMill Creek - Cheboygan Co.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialDingman Marshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:27:14Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:27:14Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55011
dc.description.abstractDisturbances, physical and biological, have been known to impact communities by killing or displacing organisms and/or changing their environment. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis proposes the idea that an intermediate amount of disturbance will enhance local diversity by providing more niches for different organisms and controlling the abundance of a competitively dominant species. Our study tested the validity of this hypothesis by examining three Northern Michigan streams, each containing a water retention structure. We tested our prediction that diversity would be greatest at an intermediately disturbed area by comparing three sites on each of three streams. Our upstream site, for the purposes of our study, was assumed to be relatively minimally disturbed, our site directly downstream of the structure was assumed to be relatively highly disturbed, and our site approximately 150 meters downstream from the structure was assumed to be relatively intermediately disturbed. We tested a variety of abiotic factors and collected macroinvertebrate samples from each site. After running the Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index on the orders of our organisms and running regression analyses on all of the abiotic data against the biotic data, we found that at two of our three rivers, diversity was highest at the intermediately disturbed site, and that there was no correlation (with the exception of flow rate) between the abiotic factors and macroinvertebrate diversity.en_US
dc.format.extent434012 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherSPECIESen_US
dc.subject.otherDIVERSITYen_US
dc.subject.otherDISTURBANCEen_US
dc.subject.otherRIVERSen_US
dc.subject.otherDAMSen_US
dc.subject.otherSTREAMSen_US
dc.subject.otherBENTHICen_US
dc.subject.otherINSECTSen_US
dc.subject.otherAQUATICen_US
dc.subject.otherIMPOUNDMENTSen_US
dc.subject.otherOXYGENen_US
dc.subject.otherCONDUCTIVITYen_US
dc.subject.otherTEMPERATUREen_US
dc.subject.otherFLOWen_US
dc.subject.otherSTABILITYen_US
dc.titleThe effect of water retention structures on the distribution and diversity of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates in three northern Michigan streams.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55011/1/3452.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3452.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Accessibility: If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.