Show simple item record

Future management of the threatened Cirsium pitcheri: effects of interspecific competition and percent cover on both individual plant and population survival.

dc.contributor.authorWhalen, Lindsayen_US
dc.coverage.spatialSturgeon Bay Dunesen_US
dc.coverage.spatialWilderness State Parken_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:30:50Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:30:50Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55037
dc.description.abstractPitcher's thistle (Cirsium pitcheri), a threatened plant endemic to the shores of the Great Lakes, occupies habitats ranging from active beaches and blowouts, through partially stabilized sand dunes, to stabilized sandy grass areas (Chen and Maun 1998). The unique and rapid changes in dune habitat caused by sand erosion and accretion are particularly conducive to the success of Pitcher's thistle. The persistence of thistle populations requires large dune system landscapes with an abundance of open sand area in which to disperse seeds and continuous geological processes allowing colonization of newly created habitats. This metapopulations dynamic of C. pitcheri is essential to understand when attempting to determine what factors are important in protection and recovery (Pavlovic 2000). Both sand movement and seed dispersal are greatly affected by community structure of populations (McEachern 1992). In the present study, we focus on two elements of community structure: interspecific competition, measured as nearest neighbor distance, and percent plant cover and investigate there relationship to both individual plant and population success. We predicted that both populations and plants will be most successful with less than 50% plant cover. We also predicted that individual plants will be most successful with the presence of neighbors, to help stabilize the sand, but without excessively close neighbors to seed production and growth. We expected to see more individual success with intermediate neighbor distances. We observed five different thistle populations and collected data on height, age, # of buds, and neighbor distance for ten representative plants. We assessed total stem count and percent plant cover for each population pertaining to both individual plant success (juvenile:height/age; adult: # of buds) and population success (total stem count) to test our hypotheses. Our data show no correlation between percent plant cover nor interspecific competition and individual plant and population success of C. pitcheri. Our results suggest that other factors of community structure such as climate, soil, nutrients or wind may be more important to the success of Pitcher's thistle. These results may yield a greater understanding of thistle habitat and could potentially facilitate the protection and recovery of this threatened plant.en_US
dc.format.extent493050 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationDune and Swale Complexen_US
dc.titleFuture management of the threatened Cirsium pitcheri: effects of interspecific competition and percent cover on both individual plant and population survival.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55037/1/3479.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3479.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.