Show simple item record

Dispersal and colonization success of monoraphid vs. biraphid diatoms (Bacillariophyta).

dc.contributor.authorGiordimaina, Alicia M.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialLancaster Lakeen_US
dc.coverage.spatialMunro Lakeen_US
dc.coverage.spatialDouglas Lakeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-14T23:33:38Z
dc.date.available2007-06-14T23:33:38Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55057
dc.description.abstractMonoraphid diatoms (Bacillariophyta) evolved more recently than biraphid diatoms. Monoraphids initially support two raphes, but seal the second raphe during the valve construction process. I studied the change in relative abundance sizes of biraphid and monoraphid diatoms colonizing artificial substrates to determine if the monoraphid condition was advantageous to early colonists. Three monoraphid species (Cocconeis placentula, Achnanthidium minutissimum, and Eucocconeis flexella) and three biraphid species (Mastogloia smithii, Navicula cryptotenella, and Sellaphora pupula) were examined. Original diatom collections were made from artificial substrates in three northern Michigan lakes over the course of 21 days in 1975. Monoraphid and biraphid relative abundances were counted on days 1, 3, 6, 15, and 21. The hypothesis that monoraphids would initially out-compete biraphids as pioneer colonists had mixed support. Because both groups' relative abundances tended to increase over time and the site of collection had no effect on relative abundance, results suggest that both monoraphid and biraphid diatoms were colonizing the artificial substrate. There was no difference in relative abundance size across all lakes and all days. However, the monoraphid relative abundance increased faster than the biraphid relative abundance. Further research is necessary to determine why monoraphids have higher relative abundance growth rates.en_US
dc.format.extent439774 bytes
dc.format.extent3144 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.haspartDiagram or Illustrationen_US
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.relation.haspartMapen_US
dc.relation.haspartTable of Numbersen_US
dc.subjectPhycologyen_US
dc.subject.otherDIATOMSen_US
dc.subject.otherALGAEen_US
dc.subject.otherARTIFICIALen_US
dc.subject.otherSUBSTRATESen_US
dc.subject.otherCOLONIZATIONen_US
dc.subject.otherIMMIGRATIONen_US
dc.titleDispersal and colonization success of monoraphid vs. biraphid diatoms (Bacillariophyta).en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resource and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55057/1/3502.pdfen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 3502.pdf : Access restricted to on-site users at the U-M Biological Station.en_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.