Show simple item record

Geometric visibility of mirror-mounted turn signals

dc.contributor.authorReed, Matthew P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFlannagan, M. J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-20T15:33:15Z
dc.date.available2007-06-20T15:33:15Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier97205en_US
dc.identifier.otherUMTRI-2003-18en_US
dc.identifier.otherPB2004-100046en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55185
dc.description"September 2003."en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 27)en_US
dc.description.abstractTurn signals mounted on exterior rearview mirrors are increasingly being used as original equipment on passenger cars and light trucks. The potential for mirror-mounted turn signals (MMTS) to improve the geometric visibility of turn signals is examined in this report. A survey of U.S. and European regulations showed that the turn signals of a vehicle that is minimally compliant with U.S. regulations are not visible to a driver of a nearby vehicle in an adjacent lane. Measurements of mirror location and window geometry were made on 74 passenger cars and light trucks, including 38 vehicles with European-style side repeaters. These data were combined with data on driver eye locations from two previous studies to assess the relative visibility of MMTS and conventional signals. Simulations were conducted to examine the potential for signals to be obstructed when a driver looks laterally through the passenger-side window. With a vehicle population that is fifty percent light trucks, MMTS are visible 52 percent more often than European side repeaters in this scenario. Based on the lateral visibility analysis, the optimal height for geometric visibility of a signal in the adjacent-vehicle scenario is 124 cm above the ground, approximately the average height of a light truck mirror. A plan-view eccentricity analysis showed that an MMTS is much closer to the viewing driver’s forward-directed line of sight than rear-mounted turn signals when the viewing driver’s vehicle is in or near the blind zone between the signaling driver’s mirror and direct peripheral fields of view. The report concludes that MMTS can improve the geometric visibility of turn signals in the adjacent-vehicle scenario that is believed to precede many lane-change/merge crashes. Further research will be necessary to determine if improved geometric visibility is accompanied by improved detection of turn signals by viewing drivers, and whether improved detection of turn signals has important safety implications.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMichigan University, Ann Arbor, Industry Affiliation Program for Human Factors in Transportation Safetyen_US
dc.formatill.en_US
dc.format.extent32en_US
dc.format.extent857162 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen_US
dc.subject.otherTurn-Signal Indicatorsen_US
dc.subject.otherTurn Signalsen_US
dc.subject.otherSide-View Mirrorsen_US
dc.subject.otherVisibilityen_US
dc.subject.otherSafety Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherData Analysisen_US
dc.titleGeometric visibility of mirror-mounted turn signalsen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55185/1/UMTRI-2003-18.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.