Show simple item record

Expert models and modeling processes associated with a computer-modeling tool An earlier version of the work was presented at NARST 2002 conference This article is based upon the work done at the University of Michigan Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation

dc.contributor.authorZhang, BaoHuien_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xiufengen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrajcik, Joseph S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-11T18:14:37Z
dc.date.available2007-07-11T18:14:37Z
dc.date.issued2006-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationZhang, BaoHui; Liu, Xiufeng; Krajcik, Joseph S. (2006). "Expert models and modeling processes associated with a computer-modeling tool An earlier version of the work was presented at NARST 2002 conference This article is based upon the work done at the University of Michigan Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation ." Science Education 90(4): 579-604. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55226>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0036-8326en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-237Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55226
dc.description.abstractHolding the premise that the development of expertise is a continuous process, this study concerns expert models and modeling processes associated with a modeling tool called Model-It. Five advanced Ph.D. students in environmental engineering and public health used Model-It to create and test models of water quality. Using “think aloud” technique and video recording, we captured their computer screen modeling activities and thinking processes. We also interviewed them the day following their modeling sessions to further probe the rationale of their modeling practices. We analyzed both the audio–video transcripts and the experts' models. We found the experts' modeling processes followed the linear sequence built in the modeling program with few instances of moving back and forth. They specified their goals up front and spent a long time thinking through an entire model before acting. They specified relationships with accurate and convincing evidence. Factors (i.e., variables) in expert models were clustered, and represented by specialized technical terms. Based on the above findings, we made suggestions for improving model-based science teaching and learning using Model-It. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 90 :579–2604, 2006en_US
dc.format.extent531571 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.titleExpert models and modeling processes associated with a computer-modeling tool An earlier version of the work was presented at NARST 2002 conference This article is based upon the work done at the University of Michigan Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616 ; National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGraduate School of Education, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 12460en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55226/1/20129_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20129en_US
dc.identifier.sourceScience Educationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.