Show simple item record

A study on academic integrity among engineering undergraduates (preliminary conclusions).

dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Donald D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHarding, Trevor S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Susan M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSteneck, Nicholas H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-16T18:11:19Z
dc.date.available2007-07-16T18:11:19Z
dc.date.issued2002-06en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55257
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12762926&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractStudent academic dishonesty, commonly referred to as cheating, has become a serious problem at institutions of higher education. This is particularly true of engineering students who, according to previous research, are among the most likely to cheat in college. To investigate this concern, the authors have undertaken a research project on the Perceptions and Attitudes toward Cheating among Engineering Students (P.A.C.E.S.). The premise of this research is that a combination of pressures, rather than malicious motivations, account for most student cheating. The P.A.C.E.S study consists of a seven page, self-reported survey that investigates: (1) student definitions of academic dishonesty; (2) the magnitude of academic dishonesty among engineering undergraduates; (3) the correlations of academic dishonesty with theories of psychological, demographic and situational factors; and (4) student opinions on different approaches used to discourage academic dishonesty. The survey was administered to approximately 350 engineering and pre engineering undergraduates at 5 institutions, ranging from community colleges to a large research university. This paper will discuss some of the current results from the study as well as future goals, which include the refinement and further distribution of the survey instrument and the development of practical pedagogical methods to help students avoid the pressure of cheating and a better understanding of what students and faculty perceive as cheating.en_US
dc.format.extent49317 bytes
dc.format.extent1346 bytes
dc.format.extent74081 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherProceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.en_US
dc.titleA study on academic integrity among engineering undergraduates (preliminary conclusions).en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLawrence Technological Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherKettering Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid12762926en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55257/3/2002 ASEE PACES1.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameResearch on Learning and Teaching (CRLT)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.