Show simple item record

Cheating in College and its Influence on Ethical Behavior in Professional Engineering Practice

dc.contributor.authorHarding, Trevor S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFinelli, Cynthia J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Donald D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-16T18:13:54Z
dc.date.available2007-07-16T18:13:54Z
dc.date.issued2006-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55273>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55273
dc.description.abstractResearch has demonstrated that engineering undergraduates report rates of cheating higher than those in most other disciplines and that students who cheat in college are more likely to make unethical decisions as professionals. To explore the relationship between academic and professional ethical behavior, the authors launched the Work Experience Study (WES) that examines students' decision-making processes in situations where they are tempted to engage in unethical behavior in academic and professional settings. The population sampled for WES includes engineering undergraduates with substantial work experience in engineering. Such a sampling strategy enables us to make comparisons between academic and work-place scenarios based on responses that are both contemporary and relevant. Previously the authors presented findings from the study which suggest that individuals who reported cheating in high school were much more likely to do so in college and in the work-place, as compared to those who indicated they had not cheated in high school. In addition, these findings identified similarities between the pressures to cheat reported by students for an academic scenario and a work-place scenario. This paper focuses on the interaction of several variables involved in this decision, including prior engagement in academic dishonesty, the perception of unethical behavior among one’s peers, the context of the unethical behavior, and the frequency with which respondents are tempted to engage in unethical behavior. The results suggest that while there are many similarities in the decision-making processes involved at the academic and professional level, there are also substantial differences in both the nature and magnitude of the relationships between predictor variables. Such a finding points to the need for further research into developing a better understanding of the complex interplay of psychological, moral, and situational factors on the ethical decision-making of students and professionals alike.en_US
dc.format.extent42417 bytes
dc.format.extent1348 bytes
dc.format.extent500976 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleCheating in College and its Influence on Ethical Behavior in Professional Engineering Practiceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCollege of Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Research on Learning and Teachingen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCalifornia Polytechnic State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLawrence Technological Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55273/3/2006 ASEE Harding Ethics Final Paper.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameResearch on Learning and Teaching (CRLT)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.