On the Economics of Securitization: A Framework and Some Lessons from U.S. Experience
dc.contributor.author | Van Order, Robert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-07-23T18:27:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-07-23T18:27:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-05 | |
dc.identifier | 1082 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55302 | |
dc.description.abstract | The paper provides a framework for analyzing the development of securitization as a vehicle for funding loans. Broadly speaking there are two models for funding loans: the portfolio lender model, which typically involves banks or other intermediaries originating and holding the loans and funding them mainly with debt, most often deposits, and the securitization model, which involves tapping bond markets for funds, for instance by pooling loans and selling shares in the pools. A central issue with securitization is that while securities markets are efficient sources of funding, they also involve agency costs because bond market investors are often at an informational disadvantage relative to other traders. The paper discusses alternative structures and tradeoffs among them, and the role of the public policy in securitization. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 135232 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.subject | Securitization, structuring, bond markets | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Finance | en_US |
dc.title | On the Economics of Securitization: A Framework and Some Lessons from U.S. Experience | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Ross School of Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55302/1/1082-VanOrder.pdf | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Business, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.